首页> 外文期刊>Physics Letters, B. Nuclear Physics and High Energy Physics >Gluon condensates and precise mc,b from QCD-moments and their ratios to order αs3 and {left double angle bracket;G~4{right double angle bracket}
【24h】

Gluon condensates and precise mc,b from QCD-moments and their ratios to order αs3 and {left double angle bracket;G~4{right double angle bracket}

机译:来自QCD矩的胶凝体冷凝物和精确的mc,b及其比值,达到αs3和{左双尖括号; G〜4 {右双尖括号}

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We reconsider the extraction of the gluon condensates {left double angle bracket;α_sG~2{right double angle bracket}, {left double angle bracket;g~3f_(ab))G~3{right double angle bracket} and the MS running quark masses mc,b from different Mn(Q2) moments and their ratios by including PT corrections to order αs3, NPT terms up to {left double angle bracket;G~4{right double angle bracket} and using stability criteria of the results versus the degree n (number of Q~2-derivative). We explicitly show that the spectral part of the lowest moment M1(0) depends strongly (as expected) on its high-energy (continuum) contribution, which is minimized for Mn≥3-4(0). Using higher moments and the correlations of {left double angle bracket;α_sG~2{right double angle bracket} with {left double angle bracket;g~3f_(abc)G~3{right double angle bracket} and {left double angle bracket;G~4{right double angle bracket}, we obtain {left double angle bracket;α_sG~2{right double angle bracket}=(7.0±1.3)×10~(-2)GeV~4 and {left double angle bracket;g~3f_(abc)G~3{right double angle bracket}=(8.8±5.5)GeV~2×{left double angle bracket;α_sG~2{right double angle bracket}, while our analysis favours a modified precise factorisation for {left double angle bracket;G~4{right double angle bracket}. Using the previous results, we re-determine mc(mc) and find that the commonly used M1(0) lowest moment tends to overestimate its value compared to the ones from higher moments where stable values of mc(mc) versus the variations of n and the continuum models are reached. These features can indicate that the quoted errors of mc,b from M1(0) may have been underestimated. Our best results from different high-n moments and their ratios are: mc(mc)=1261(16)MeV and mb(mb)=4171(14)MeV, in excellent agreement with results obtained in Narison (2010) [1] using some judicious choices of ratios of moments.
机译:我们重新考虑了胶凝析物的提取{左双尖括号;α_sG〜2 {右双尖括号},{左双尖括号; g〜3f_(ab))G〜3 {右双尖括号}和MS运行通过包含PT校正直到最高{左双尖括号; G〜4 {右双尖括号}的阶次αs3,NPT项,并使用结果的稳定性标准来比较不同Mn(Q2)矩及其比率的夸克质量mc,b n度(Q〜2导数的个数)。我们明确表明,最低矩M1(0)的频谱部分强烈(如预期的那样)取决于其高能量(连续)贡献,对于Mn≥3-4(0)最小。使用更高的矩和{左双尖括号;α_sG〜2 {右双尖括号}与{左双尖括号; g〜3f_(abc)G〜3 {右双尖括号}}和{左双尖括号的相关性; G〜4 {右双尖括号},我们得到{左双尖括号;α_sG〜2 {右双尖括号} =(7.0±1.3)×10〜(-2)GeV〜4和{左双尖括号; g〜3f_(abc)G〜3 {右双尖括号} =(8.8±5.5)GeV〜2×{左双尖括号;α_sG〜2 {右双尖括号}},而我们的分析则倾向于改进的精确分解用于{左双尖括号; G〜4 {右双尖括号}。使用先前的结果,我们重新确定mc(mc),发现与较高时刻(通常mc(mc)的稳定值相对于n的变化)相比,常用的M1(0)最低时刻往往会高估其值。并达到连续模型。这些特征可以表明,来自M1(0)的mc,b引用的误差可能已被低估了。我们从不同的高n矩及其比率得出的最佳结果是:mc(mc)= 1261(16)MeV和mb(mb)= 4171(14)MeV,与Narison(2010)的结果非常吻合[1]使用一些明智的矩比选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号