...
首页> 外文期刊>Biometrical Journal >Predictive Bayesian inference and dynamic treatment regimes
【24h】

Predictive Bayesian inference and dynamic treatment regimes

机译:预测贝叶斯推理和动态处理方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) can be estimated without specification of a predictive model, a model-based approach, combined with dynamic programming and Monte Carlo integration, enables direct probabilistic comparisons between the outcomes under the optimal DTR and alternative (dynamic or static) treatment regimes. The Bayesian predictive approach also circumvents problems related to frequentist estimators under the nonregular estimation problem. However, the model-based approach is susceptible to misspecification, in particular of the null-paradox type, which is due to the model parameters not having a direct causal interpretation in the presence of latent individual-level characteristics. Because it is reasonable to insist on correct inferences under the null of no difference between the alternative treatment regimes, we discuss how to achieve this through a null-robust reparametrization of the problem in a longitudinal setting. Since we argue that causal inference can be entirely understood as posterior predictive inference in a hypothetical population without covariate imbalances, we also discuss how controlling for confounding through inverse probability of treatment weighting can be justified and incorporated in the Bayesian setting.
机译:虽然无需指定预测模型即可估算最佳动态治疗方案(DTR),但基于模型的方法结合动态编程和蒙特卡洛积分,可以在最佳DTR和替代方案(动态或静态)之间直接进行概率比较)治疗方案。贝叶斯预测方法还规避了非常规估计问题下与常客估计有关的问题。但是,基于模型的方法容易出现错误指定,尤其是无效悖论类型,这是由于模型参数在潜在的个人级别特征存在下没有直接的因果解释。因为在替代治疗方案之间没有差异的零值下坚持正确的推理是合理的,所以我们讨论了如何通过在纵向环境中对问题进行零值鲁棒重新参数化来实现这一点。由于我们认为因果推论可以完全理解为在没有协变量不平衡的假设人群中的后验预测推论,因此我们也讨论了如何通过治疗加权的逆概率来控制混杂因素是合理的,并纳入贝叶斯环境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号