首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary clinical trials >A community randomised controlled trial evaluating a home-based environmental intervention package of improved stoves, solar water disinfection and kitchen sinks in rural Peru: rationale, trial design and baseline findings.
【24h】

A community randomised controlled trial evaluating a home-based environmental intervention package of improved stoves, solar water disinfection and kitchen sinks in rural Peru: rationale, trial design and baseline findings.

机译:社区随机对照试验评估了秘鲁农村地区以家庭为基础的环境干预措施,包括改进的炉灶,太阳能水消毒和厨房水槽:基本原理,试验设计和基准调查结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia and diarrhoea are leading causes of death in children. There is a need to develop effective interventions. OBJECTIVE: We present the design and baseline findings of a community-randomised controlled trial in rural Peru to evaluate the health impact of an Integrated Home-based Intervention Package in children aged 6 to 35 months. METHODS: We randomised 51 communities. The intervention was developed through a community-participatory approach prior to the trial. They comprised the construction of improved stoves and kitchen sinks, the promotion of hand washing, and solar drinking water disinfection (SODIS). To reduce the potential impact of non-blinding bias, a psychomotor stimulation intervention was implemented in the control arm. The baseline survey included anthropometric and socio-economic characteristics. In a sub-sample we determined the level of faecal contamination of drinking water, hands and kitchen utensils and the prevalence of diarrhoegenic Escherichia coli in stool specimen. RESULTS: We enrolled 534 children. At baseline all households used open fires and 77% had access to piped water supplies. E. coli was found in drinking water in 68% and 64% of the intervention and control households. Diarrhoegenic E. coli strains were isolated from 45/139 stool samples. The proportion of stunted children was 54%. CONCLUSIONS: Randomization resulted in comparable study arms. Recently, several critical reviews raised major concerns on the reliability of open health intervention trials, because of uncertain sustainability and non-blinding bias. In this regard, the presented trial featuring objective outcome measures, a simultaneous intervention in the control communities and a 12-month follow up period will provide valuable evidence.
机译:简介:肺炎和腹泻是儿童死亡的主要原因。有必要制定有效的干预措施。目的:我们介绍了一项在秘鲁农村进行的社区随机对照试验的设计和基线研究结果,以评估综合家庭干预措施对6至35个月大儿童的健康影响。方法:我们随机分配了51个社区。干预措施是在试验前通过社区参与的方法制定的。其中包括建造改进的炉灶和厨房水槽,促进洗手和太阳能饮用水消毒(SODIS)。为了减少非致盲性偏见的潜在影响,在对照组中实施了精神运动刺激干预。基线调查包括人体测量学和社会经济特征。在一个子样本中,我们确定了粪便中饮用水,手和厨房用具的粪便污染水平以及腹泻性大肠埃希菌的患病率。结果:我们招募了534名儿童。基线时,所有家庭都使用明火,有77%的家庭可以使用自来水。在68%和64%的干预和对照家庭的饮用水中发现了大肠杆菌。从45/139份粪便样品中分离出腹泻性大肠杆菌菌株。发育不良儿童的比例为54%。结论:随机分组可比较研究组。最近,由于不确定的可持续性和非盲目的偏见,一些关键性评论引起了人们对开放式健康干预试验的可靠性的主要关注。在这方面,提出的试验以客观的结果指标,对对照人群的同时干预以及为期12个月的随访为特色,将提供有价值的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号