首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >RBC transfusion practices among critically ill patients: Has evidence changed practice?
【24h】

RBC transfusion practices among critically ill patients: Has evidence changed practice?

机译:重症患者中的RBC输血实践:证据改变了实践吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Increasing evidence, including publication of the Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care trial in 1999, supports a lower hemoglobin threshold for RBC transfusion in ICU patients. However, little is known regarding the influence of this evidence on clinical practice over time in a large population-based cohort. Design: Retrospective population-based cohort study. Setting: Thirty-five Maryland hospitals. Patients: Seventy-three thousand three hundred eighty-five nonsurgical adults with an ICU stay greater than 1 day between 1994 and 2007. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The unadjusted odds of patients receiving an RBC transfusion increased from 7.9% during the pre-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care baseline period (1994-1998) to 14.7% during the post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period (1999-2007). A logistic regression model, including 40 relevant patient and hospital characteristics, compared the annual trend in the adjusted odds of RBC transfusion during the pre- versus post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care periods. During the pre-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period, the trend in the adjusted odds of RBC transfusion did not differ between hospitals averaging > 200 annual ICU discharges and hospitals averaging ≤ 200 annual ICU discharges (odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.13] annually and 1.03 [95% CI, 0.99-1.07] annually, respectively; p = 0.401). However, during the post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period, the adjusted odds of RBC transfusion decreased over time in higher ICU volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98] annually) but continued to increase in lower ICU volume hospitals (odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.08-1.13] annually), p < 0.001. Conclusions: In this population-based cohort of ICU patients, the unadjusted odds of RBC transfusion increased in both higher and lower ICU volume hospitals both before and after Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care publication. After adjusting for relevant characteristics, the odds continued to increase in lower ICU volume hospitals in the post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period, but it decreased in higher ICU volume hospitals. This suggests that evidence supporting restrictive RBC transfusion thresholds may not be uniformly translated into practice in different hospital settings.
机译:目的:越来越多的证据(包括1999年发表的《重症监护中的输血要求》试验)支持降低ICU患者RBC输血的血红蛋白阈值。然而,关于这一证据在基于人群的大型队列中随时间推移对临床实践的影响知之甚少。设计:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。地点:马里兰州的35家医院。患者:1994年至2007年之间,有ICU的73,835名非手术成年人的停留时间超过1天。干预措施:无。测量和主要结果:接受RBC输血的患者的未调整赔率从重症监护基线期间(1994-1998)的输血前需求期间的7.9%增加到重症监护期间(1999-1998)的输血后需求期间的14.7% 2007)。包括40个相关患者和医院特征的逻辑回归模型比较了重症监护期间在输血前后需求期间红细胞输注调整后几率的年度趋势。在重症监护前的输血前要求期间,平均每年ICU排出量> 200的医院和平均ICU排出量≤200的医院之间,红细胞输注的调整几率趋势没有差异(赔率,1.07 [95%CI,1.01 -1.13]每年和1.03 [95%CI,0.99-1.07]每年; p = 0.401)。但是,在重症监护病房输血后需求期间,较高ICU量医院的红细胞调整输注几率随时间降低(赔率,每年0.96 [95%CI,0.93-0.98],但在较低ICU中继续增加大型医院(赔率,每年1.10 [95%CI,1.08-1.13]),p <0.001。结论:在这个以人群为基础的ICU患者队列中,重症监护病房的《输血要求》前后,在较高和较低的ICU量医院中,未经调整的RBC输血几率均增加。在调整了相关特征后,重症监护期间输血后需求量较低的ICU量医院的几率继续增加,而较高ICU量医院的几率则降低了。这表明支持限制性红细胞输注阈值的证据可能在不同医院环境中无法统一转化为实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号