【24h】

Influence of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor learning.

机译:5 Hz重复经颅磁刺激对运动学习的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of our study was to assess a possible improvement in motor learning induced by 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of human motor cortex. The same stimulation protocol previously enhanced perceptual learning as assessed by tactile discrimination performance when applied to the human primary somatosensory cortex. We applied 1250 pulses of 5 Hz "real" rTMS at 90% of resting motor threshold to the motor hotspot of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle in 15 healthy subjects before 1h of motor training. Furthermore, 15 subjects received 5 Hz "sham" rTMS and served as control group. The motor task consisted of a synchronized co-contraction of the right APB and deltoid muscle. The latency between the onsets of muscle contractions was measured during training and served as a parameter for motor learning. MEP amplitudes were assessed in a subgroup of 10 subjects before and after rTMS as a parameter of corticospinal excitability. We found a significant learning effect in both groups as indicated by a reduction of latencies between the onsets of muscle contractions in the course of the training. Corticospinal excitability increased after "real", but not after "sham" rTMS. However, "real" rTMS did not significantly influence motor learning as compared to "sham" rTMS. We conclude that 5 Hz rTMS of human primary motor cortex is not able to improve motor learning in healthy subjects, which might be due to the higher complexity of motor learning as compared to perceptual learning in the tactile domain.
机译:我们研究的目的是评估人类运动皮层的5 Hz重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)诱导的运动学习的可能改善。相同的刺激方案先前可增强触觉学习能力,如将触觉识别能力应用于人的初级体感皮层时,该知觉学习能力得到了提高。在运动训练1h之前,我们对15位健康受试者的外展肌短肌(APB)肌肉的运动热点施加了1250个5 Hz“真实” rTMS脉冲,其静止运动阈值为90%。此外,15名受试者接受了5 Hz的“假” rTMS并作为对照组。运动任务包括右APB和三角肌的同步共收缩。在训练期间测量了肌肉收缩发作之间的潜伏期,并将其用作运动学习的参数。在rTMS之前和之后,在10名受试者的亚组中评估MEP振幅,作为皮质脊髓兴奋性的参数。我们发现两组都具有显着的学习效果,这可以通过减少训练过程中肌肉收缩发作之间的等待时间来表明。皮质脊髓兴奋性在“真实”后增加,但在“假” rTMS之后没有增加。但是,与“假” rTMS相比,“真实” rTMS不会显着影响运动学习。我们得出结论,人类主运动皮层的5 Hz rTMS不能改善健康受试者的运动学习,这可能是由于与触觉领域中的感知学习相比,运动学习的复杂性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号