首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Hypertonic saline versus mannitol for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
【24h】

Hypertonic saline versus mannitol for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机译:高渗盐水与甘露醇治疗颅内压升高:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Randomized trials have suggested that hypertonic saline solutions may be superior to mannitol for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure, but their impact on clinical practice has been limited, partly by their small size. We therefore combined their findings in a meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched for relevant studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials were included if they directly compared equiosmolar doses of hypertonic sodium solutions to mannitol for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure in human subjects undergoing quantitative intracranial pressure measurement. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently reviewed potentially eligible trials and extracted data using a preformed data collection sheet. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or by a third investigator if needed. We collected data on patient demographics, type of intracranial pathology, baseline intracranial pressure, osms per treatment dose, quantitative change in intracranial pressure, and prespecified adverse events. Our primary outcome was the proportion of successfully treated episodes of elevated intracranial pressure. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five trials comprising 112 patients with 184 episodes of elevated intracranial pressure met our inclusion criteria. In random-effects models, the relative risk of intracranial pressure control was 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.33), and the difference in mean intracranial pressure reduction was 2.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -1.6 to 5.7), with both favoring hypertonic saline over mannitol. A mild degree of heterogeneity was present among the included trials. There were no significant adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: We found that hypertonic saline is more effective than mannitol for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure. Our meta-analysis is limited by the small number and size of eligible trials, but our findings suggest that hypertonic saline may be superior to the current standard of care and argue for a large, multicenter, randomized trial to definitively establish the first-line medical therapy for intracranial hypertension.
机译:目的:随机试验表明高渗盐溶液在治疗颅内压增高方面可能优于甘露醇,但其对临床实践的影响受到限制,部分是由于其体积小。因此,我们在荟萃分析中结合了他们的发现。数据来源:我们在MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane对照试验中央注册中心(CENTRAL),Scopus和ISI Web of Knowledge中搜索了相关研究。研究选择:如果随机比较高渗钠溶液与等渗剂量的高渗钠溶液与甘露醇之间的关系,则该试验用于对进行定量颅内压测量的人的颅内压升高进行治疗。数据提取:两名研究人员独立审查了可能符合条件的试验,并使用预先形成的数据收集表提取了数据。分歧通过共识解决,或者在需要时由第三名调查员解决。我们收集了有关患者人口统计学,颅内病理类型,颅内基线压强,每个治疗剂量的渗透压,颅内压的定量变化以及预定不良事件的数据。我们的主要结局是成功治疗的颅内压增高发作的比例。数据综合:包括112例患者,其中184例颅内压升高的五项试验符合我们的纳入标准。在随机效应模型中,颅内压控制的相对风险为1.16(95%置信区间,1.00-1.33),平均颅内压降低的差异为2.0 mm Hg(95%置信区间,-1.6至5.7),两者都偏爱高渗盐水而不是甘露醇。在纳入的试验中存在轻度的异质性。没有明显的不良事件报道。结论:我们发现高渗盐水在治疗颅内压增高方面比甘露醇更有效。我们的荟萃分析受到合格试验的数量和规模的限制,但我们的发现表明高渗盐水可能优于当前的护理标准,并主张进行大型,多中心,随机试验以明确建立一线医学颅内高压疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号