首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Bench-to-bedside review: The initial hemodynamic resuscitation of the septic patient according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines - does one size fit all?
【24h】

Bench-to-bedside review: The initial hemodynamic resuscitation of the septic patient according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines - does one size fit all?

机译:从病床到病床的回顾:根据存活脓毒症运动指南对败血症患者进行的初始血流动力学复苏-一种尺寸是否合适?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

ABSTRACT: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock recommend that the initial hemodynamic resuscitation be done according to the protocol used by Rivers and colleagues in their well-known early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) study. However, it may well be that their patients were much sicker on admission than many other septic patients. Compared with other populations of septic patients, the patients of Rivers and colleagues had a higher incidence of severe comorbidities, a more severe hemodynamic status on admission (excessively low central venous oxygen saturation [ScvO2], low central venous pressure [CVP], and high lactate), and higher mortality rates. Therefore, it may well be that these patients arrived to the hospital in late untreated hypovolemic sepsis, which may have been due, in part at least, to low socioeconomic status and reduced access to health care. The EGDT protocol uses target values for CVP and ScvO2 to guide hemodynamic management. However, filling pressures do not reliably predict the response to fluid administration, while the ScvO2 of septic patients is characteristically high due to decreased oxygen extraction. For all these reasons, it seems that the hemodynamic component of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines cannot be applied to all septic patients, particularly those who develop sepsis during their hospital stay.
机译:摘要:《重度脓毒症和脓毒性休克的生存脓毒症运动指南》建议根据Rivers及其同事在其著名的早期目标导向疗法(EGDT)研究中所使用的方案进行初始血液动力学复苏。但是,很可能是他们的病人在入院时比许多其他败血症病人病得多。与其他败血症患者相比,Rivers及其同事的患者发生严重合并症的几率更高,入院时的血液动力学状况更为严重(过低的中心静脉血氧饱和度[ScvO2],过低的中心静脉压[CVP]和较高的乳酸),死亡率更高。因此,这些患者很可能是在未经治疗的低血容量性败血症的情况下到达医院的,这至少部分是由于社会经济地位低下和获得医疗服务的机会减少所致。 EGDT协议使用CVP和ScvO2的目标值来指导血液动力学管理。然而,充盈压力不能可靠地预测对输液的反应,而败血症患者的ScvO2由于氧气提取减少而具有很高的特征。由于所有这些原因,似乎不能将“幸存败血症运动”指南中的血液动力学成分应用于所有败血症患者,尤其是在住院期间发生败血症的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号