...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Effect of Oropharyngeal povidone-iodine preventive oral care on ventilator-associated pneumonia in severely brain-injured or cerebral hemorrhage patients: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effect of Oropharyngeal povidone-iodine preventive oral care on ventilator-associated pneumonia in severely brain-injured or cerebral hemorrhage patients: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial

机译:预防性口咽聚​​乙烯吡咯烷酮碘对严重脑损伤或脑出血患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral care with povidone-iodine on the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a high-risk population. DESIGN:: A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, two-parallel-group trial performed between May 2008 and May 2011. SETTING:: Six ICUs in France. PATIENTS:: One hundred seventy-nine severely brain-injured patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) or cerebral hemorrhage expected to be mechanically ventilated for more than 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS:: Participants were randomly assigned to receive oropharyngeal care with povidone-iodine (n = 91) or placebo (n = 88) six times daily until mechanical ventilation withdrawal. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: Primary endpoint was the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Secondary endpoint included the rates of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and acute respiratory distress syndrome and patient's outcome. The number of patients evaluable for the primary endpoint (preplanned modified intention-to-treat population) was 150 (78 in the povidone-iodine group, 72 in the placebo group). Ventilator-associated pneumonia occurred in 24 patients (31%) in the povidone-iodine group and 20 (28%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.67-1.82]; p = 0.69). There was no significant difference between the two groups for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: eight patients (10%) in the povidone-iodine group and five patients (7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.51-4.31]; p = 0.47). Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred in five patients in the povidone-iodine group but not in the placebo group (p = 0.06). There was no difference between groups for ICU and hospital lengths of stay, as well as ICU and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS:: There is no evidence to recommend oral care with povidone-iodine to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in high-risk patients. Furthermore, this strategy seems to increase the rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
机译:目的:评估在高风险人群中使用聚维酮碘进行口腔护理对呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生的有效性和安全性。设计::一项于2008年5月至2011年5月进行的多中心,安慰剂对照,随机,双盲,两组平行试验。地点:法国的6个ICU。患者:一百七十九名严重脑损伤的患者(格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8)或脑出血,预计将进行机械通气24小时以上。干预措施:参与者被随机分配每天接受六次聚维酮碘(n = 91)或安慰剂(n = 88)的口咽护理,直到机械通气停止。测量和主要结果:主要终点是呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。次要终点包括呼吸机相关气管支气管炎和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的发生率以及患者的预后。可评估主要终点(预先计划的改良意向治疗人群)的患者人数为150(聚维酮碘组为78,安慰剂组为72)。聚维酮碘治疗组有24例呼吸机相关性肺炎(31%),安慰剂治疗组有20例(28%)(相对危险度,1.11 [95%CI,0.67-1.82]; p = 0.69)。两组呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎之间无显着差异:聚维酮碘组为8例(10%),安慰剂组为5例(7%)(相对危险度为1.48 [95%CI,0.51] 4.31]; p = 0.47)。聚维酮碘组的5例患者发生了急性呼吸窘迫综合征,而安慰剂组没有发生(p = 0.06)。两组间ICU和住院时间,ICU和90天死亡率无差异。结论:没有证据建议口服聚维酮碘预防高危患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎。此外,这种策略似乎增加了急性呼吸窘迫综合征的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号