首页> 外文期刊>Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, the University of Michigan >REASSESSMENT OF THE SAUROPOD DINOSAURJAINOSAURUS (='ANTARCTOSAURUS') SEPTENTRIONALISFROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF INDIA
【24h】

REASSESSMENT OF THE SAUROPOD DINOSAURJAINOSAURUS (='ANTARCTOSAURUS') SEPTENTRIONALISFROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF INDIA

机译:对印度上白垩统恐龙的恐龙的评估(“ ANTARCTOSAURUS”)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Early evaluations of sauropod diversity in the Cretaceous of India recognized three genera,"Titanosaurus," Antarctosaurus, and Laplatasaurus, each of which was thought to have closelyrelated species on other southern landmasses. Recent systematic work has challenged the validityof the genus "Titanosaurus " and the supposed close relationship between its constituent species,particularly those from the Cretaceous of South America and Madagascar. Likewise, Laplatasau-rus is currently recognized to be restricted to South America, and the Indian species is invalid.Here, we redescribe the anatomy of the Indian sauropod species Antarctosaurus (now known asJainosaurus) septentrionalis with the goal of examining its validity, constituency, and phyloge-netic affinity. The type series ofJainosaurus septentrionalis included a braincase, skull roof, and many post-cranial elements that were united on the basis of their large size relative to the other taxon fromthe same quarry, "Titanosaurus indicus". All postcranIal bones were missing until recently, whenthe type series humerus and a cast of the scapula were riediscovtred in the collections of the In-dian Museum. We evaluate possible associations 44tiveen type series elements, bringing to lightcircumstantial evidence that helps strengthen the= fa far grouping some of them as a single spe-cies. Both the cranial and some postcranial bones,,ve,diagnostic, allowing referral of additionalmaterials collected from the same locality and elsewhere in lndo-Pakistan to the species J. septen-trionalis. Currently two genera, Isisaurus and Jainosaurus, are-recognized from the Cretaceous of India.Unlike most titanosaurs, both Isisaurus and Jainosaurus are known from diagnostic cranial andpostcranial material recorded from multiple localities. These genera coexist in central and westernIndia, and Isisaurus has been reported recently from western Pakistan. The affinities of Jaino-saurus and Isisaurus within Titanosauria are not yet resolved, but a sister-taxon relationship to oneanother can be ruled out. Jainosaurus appears to have close relatives in Madagascar and SouthAmerica based on the data at hand. Thus far, there is no evidence for an endemic Indian sauropodfauna during the Late Cretaceous.
机译:在印度白垩纪对蜥足类动物多样性的早期评估中,人们认识到三个属,“ Titanosaurus”,“ Antarctosaurus”和“ Laplatasaurus”,它们中的每一个在其他南部陆地上都具有密切相关的物种。最近的系统工作对“霸王龙”属的有效性及其组成物种之间的紧密联系提出了挑战,特别是来自南美白垩纪和马达加斯加的物种。同样,拉普拉托龙目前被认为仅限于南美,而印度物种是无效的。在这里,我们重新描述印度蜥脚类动物南极龙(现称Ja龙)的解剖结构,以检验其有效性,选区,和系统同源性。 Jainosaurus septentrionalis的类型系列包括一个脑袋,一个颅骨顶和许多后颅骨元素,这些元素根据其相对于同一采石场“ Titanosaurus indicus”的另一个分类单元的大尺寸而结合在一起。直到最近,所有的后颅骨都丢失了,当时在印度博物馆的藏品中发现了肱骨和肩cap骨系列。我们评估了44tiveen类型系列元素的可能关联,并提供了轻环境证据,这些证据有助于进一步加强将其中一些作为单个专家进行分组的方法。颅骨和一些颅后骨均具有诊断性,因此可以将从同一地点和印多-巴基斯坦其他地方收集的其他材料转介给J. septen-trionalis物种。目前,印度白垩纪可识别出伊苏龙和Ja龙两个属,与大多数泰坦龙不同,伊苏龙和Ja龙都来自于多个地方记录的诊断性颅骨和颅后材料。这些属共存于印度中部和西部,最近从巴基斯坦西部报道了伊萨鲁斯。泰坦龙亚龙中的Ja诺龙类和异龙属的亲和力尚未解决,但可以排除与其他人的姐妹-分类关系。根据现有数据,那龙在马达加斯加和南美似乎有近亲。迄今为止,尚无证据表明白垩纪晚期存在印度特有的蜥脚类动物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号