首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Chemistry: An International Quarterly Research Journal of Chemistry >Comparison of Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Methods for Chemical Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Methods for Chemical Analysis

机译:原子吸收光谱法和能量色散X射线荧光光谱仪方法进行化学分析的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study aims to find out which method can obtained the most accurate results in less time and at the lowest cost on the basis of element. At the beginning of the study, worldwide researches about this subject are investigated. As a result of this investigation, two of the chemical analysis methods which are widely used in the elemental analysis of the inorganic raw materials used in mining were compared. Then, 15 test samples which have different compositions and generally investigated main element content were determined in order to compare. The samples were analyzed in parallel with atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (EDXRF). The compatibility and the deviations were determined by comparing the results of the analysis statistically from both methods. It was tried to determine which method can be used for which type of elements. It is observed that the material composition effects choosing appropriate method.
机译:本研究旨在找出基于元素的哪种方法可以在更短的时间内以最低的成本获得最准确的结果。在研究开始时,将对有关该主题的全球研究进行调查。这项研究的结果是,比较了两种广泛用于采矿所用无机原料元素分析的化学分析方法。然后,确定15个具有不同组成和通常研究的主要元素含量的测试样品以进行比较。样品与原子吸收光谱(AAS)和能量色散X射线荧光光谱仪(EDXRF)并行分析。通过统计比较两种方法的分析结果来确定相容性和偏差。试图确定哪种方法可以用于哪种类型的元素。观察到材料组成对选择合适方法的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号