首页> 外文期刊>Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior >Exogenous phasic alerting and spatial orienting in mild cognitive impairment compared to healthy ageing: Study outcome is related to target response.
【24h】

Exogenous phasic alerting and spatial orienting in mild cognitive impairment compared to healthy ageing: Study outcome is related to target response.

机译:与健康老龄化相比,轻度认知障碍中的外源性阶段性警报和空间定向:研究结果与靶标反应有关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whether or not attentional mechanisms such as phasic alerting, spatial cueing and inhibition of return (IOR) remain intact in adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains a matter of debate. This is possibly the result of inter-study outcome variation caused by the adoption of different methodological components by different research groups. Here we investigated the influence of methodological factors upon study outcome, using a Posner-type exogenous cueing paradigm with amnestic MCI patients and healthy older controls. Specifically, we compared results when the required response involved target discrimination with results for a simple target detection response, using cue-to-target intervals (CTIs) of 200msec and 800msec in each case and with the same participants completing all conditions. For both groups, the presence or absence of both alerting and spatial cue-related effects depended upon the combination of target response requirement and CTI. Moreover, differences between the groups were specific to certain task conditions. The MCI group showed the same alerting effects as healthy people with a discrimination response, but the alerting effect shown by controls with a 200msec CTI and target detection was absent in MCI. Patients and controls showed similar spatial cue validity effects at 200msec CTI, but group differences emerged at 800msec CTI: target discrimination evoked a validity effect in the MCI group only, while target detection evoked an IOR effect in the healthy group only. These data indicate that detection and discrimination responses may each activate different attentional mechanisms, which are themselves differentially vulnerable in MCI. Thus a seemingly arbitrary choice of response may directly influence whether attentional processing appears preserved or disrupted in MCI. Furthermore, these data provide further evidence in support of the existence of significant visual attention-related functional abnormalities in amnestic MCI.
机译:在患有阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的成年人中,诸如阶段性提示,空间提示和返回抑制(IOR)之类的注意力机制是否仍然完整,尚有争议。这可能是由于不同研究小组采用不同方法论要素而导致研究间结果差异的结果。在这里,我们使用记忆删除MCI患者和健康的老年人对照的Posner型外源提示范例,研究了方法学因素对研究结果的影响。具体来说,我们比较了所需的响应涉及目标识别时的结果与简单目标检测响应的结果,在每种情况下使用200毫秒和800毫秒的提示到目标间隔(CTI),并且由相同的参与者完成所有条件。对于这两组,警报与空间提示相关效应的存在与否取决于目标反应要求和CTI的组合。此外,各组之间的差异是特定于某些任务条件的。 MCI组显示出与具有歧视反应的健康人相同的警报效果,但是MCI中没有200毫秒CTI和目标检测的对照所显示的警报效果。患者和对照组在200毫秒CTI时显示出相似的空间提示效度效果,但在800毫秒CTI时出现组差异:仅在MCI组中目标歧视引起效度效应,而在健康组中目标检测才引起IOR效应。这些数据表明,检测和辨别响应可能各自激活不同的注意力机制,这些机制本身在MCI中具有不同的脆弱性。因此,似乎任意选择的响应可能会直接影响MCI中注意力处理是被保留还是被破坏。此外,这些数据提供了进一步的证据,支持记忆删除MCI中存在与视觉注意相关的重大功能异常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号