首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Failed IUD insertions in community practice: An under-recognized problem?
【24h】

Failed IUD insertions in community practice: An under-recognized problem?

机译:未能在社区实践中插入宫内节育器:一个未被充分认识的问题?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The data analysis was conducted to describe the rate of unsuccessful copper T380A intrauterine device (IUD) insertions among women using the IUD for emergency contraception (EC) at community family planning clinics in Utah. Methods: These data were obtained from a prospective observational trial of women choosing the copper T380A IUD for EC. Insertions were performed by nurse practitioners at two family planning clinics in order to generalize findings to the type of service setting most likely to employ this intervention. Adjuvant measures to facilitate difficult IUD insertions (cervical anesthesia, dilation, pain medication, and use of ultrasound guidance) were not utilized. The effect of parity on IUD insertion success was determined using exact logistic regression models adjusted for individual practitioner failure rates. Results: Six providers performed 197 IUD insertion attempts. These providers had a mean of 14.1 years of experience (range 1-27, S.D. ?? 12.5). Among nulliparous women, 27 of 138 (19.6%) IUD insertions were unsuccessful. In parous women, 8 of 59 IUD insertions were unsuccessful (13.6%). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) showed that IUD insertion failure was more likely in nulliparous women compared to parous women (aOR=2.31, 95% CI 0.90-6.52, p=.09). Conclusion: The high rate of unsuccessful IUD insertions reported here, particularly for nulliparous women, suggests that the true insertion failure rate of providers who are not employing additional tools for difficult insertions may be much higher than reported in clinical trials. Further investigation is necessary to determine if this is a common problem and, if so, to assess if the use of adjuvant measures will reduce the number of unsuccessful IUD insertions. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.
机译:背景:在犹他州的社区计划生育诊所使用IUD进行紧急避孕(EC)的妇女中,进行了数据分析,以描述未成功插入T380A铜宫内节育器(IUD)的女性比例。方法:这些数据来自前瞻性观察性试验,该试验对女性选择EC铜T380A IUD进行了观察。插入是由两家计划生育诊所的执业医师进行的,目的是将发现归纳为最有可能采用这种干预措施的服务类型。没有采取辅助措施来促进困难的宫内节育器插入(宫颈麻醉,扩张,止痛药和使用超声引导)。平价对宫内节育器插入成功的影响是通过针对个体从业者失效率调整的精确逻辑回归模型确定的。结果:六个提供者执行了197次IUD插入尝试。这些提供者的平均经验为14.1年(范围为1-27,S.D。≤12.5)。在未生育妇女中,有138例宫内节育器插入失败,占138例中的27例(19.6%)。在产妇中,插入59个宫内节育器中有8个未成功(13.6%)。调整后的优势比(aOR)显示,与不育妇女相比,未生育妇女的宫内节育器插入失败的可能性更高(aOR = 2.31,95%CI 0.90-6.52,p = .09)。结论:此处报道的IUD插入失败率很高,尤其是对于未生育的妇女,这表明未使用其他工具进行困难插入的医疗服务提供者的真实插入失败率可能比临床试验中报道的要高得多。有必要进行进一步的调查以确定这是否是一个普遍的问题,如果是,则需要评估使用辅助措施是否会减少不成功的宫内节育器插入的次数。 ? 2013爱思唯尔公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号