首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the contraceptive CHOICE project
【24h】

Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the contraceptive CHOICE project

机译:CHOICE避孕项目提供的结构化避孕咨询

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: We describe the contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project (CHOICE) and compare contraceptive methods selected between the university research site and community partner clinics. Study Design: We developed a structured, contraceptive counseling program. All CHOICE participants enrolling at our university research site underwent the counseling, which was evidence-based and included information about all reversible contraception. Participants enrolling at partner clinics underwent "usual" counseling. We trained 54 research team members to provide contraceptive counseling; the majority had no formal health care training. We compared the contraceptive methods chosen by participants enrolling at our university research site to participants enrolling at partner clinics who did not undergo structured contraceptive counseling. Results: There were 6,530 (86%) women who enrolled into CHOICE at our university site and 1,107 (14%) women who enrolled at partner clinics. Uptake of long-acting reversible contraception was high at both the university site and partner clinics (72% and 78%, respectively, p<.0001). However, uptake of the intrauterine device was higher at the university site (58% compared to 43%, p<.0001) and uptake of the subdermal implant was higher at partner clinics (35% versus 14%, p<.0001). After adjusting for confounders, we found no difference in the uptake of long-acting reversible contraception between women counseled at the university site compared to partner clinics (adjusted relative risk=0.98, 95% confidence interval [0.94, 1.02]). Conclusion: Structured contraceptive counseling can be effectively provided in a clinical research setting by staff without prior health care experience or clinical training.
机译:背景:我们描述了避孕选择计划(CHOICE)提供的避孕咨询,并比较了大学研究站点和社区合作伙伴诊所之间选择的避孕方法。研究设计:我们制定了结构化的避孕咨询计划。所有参加我们大学研究站点的CHOICE参与者都接受了基于证据的咨询,其中包括有关所有可逆避孕的信息。参加合作伙伴诊所的参与者接受“常规”咨询。我们培训了54名研究小组成员以提供避孕咨询;大多数人没有接受过正规的卫生保健培训。我们将参加我们大学研究站点的参与者选择的避孕方法与未接受结构化避孕咨询的伙伴诊所的参与者进行了比较。结果:在我们的大学站点中,有6,530名(86%)妇女参加了CHOICE;在合作伙伴诊所中,有1,107名妇女(14%)。在大学场所和合作伙伴诊所,长效可逆避孕措施的使用率很高(分别为72%和78%,p <.0001)。但是,大学场所子宫内装置的摄取较高(58%比43%,p <.0001),皮下植入物的摄取在伴侣诊所较高(35%对14%,p <.0001)。在对混杂因素进行调整之后,我们发现与合作伙伴诊所相比,在大学所在地接受咨询的女性在长效可逆避孕措施的吸收上没有差异(调整后的相对风险= 0.98,95%置信区间[0.94,1.02])。结论:在没有事先医疗保健经验或临床培训的情况下,工作人员可以在临床研究环境中有效地提供结构性避孕咨询。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号