首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Multicenter Retrospective Study of Cefmetazole and Flomoxef for Treatment of Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Bacteremia
【24h】

Multicenter Retrospective Study of Cefmetazole and Flomoxef for Treatment of Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Bacteremia

机译:头孢美唑和氟洛昔芬治疗广谱β-内酰胺酶生产性大肠杆菌细菌血症的多中心回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The efficacy of cefmetazole and flomoxef (CF) for the treatment of patients with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) bacteremia (ESBL-CF group) was compared with that of carbapenem treatment for ESBL-EC patients (ESBL-carbapenem group) and with that of CF treatment in patients with non-ESBL-EC bacteremia (non-ESBL-CF group). Adult patients treated for E. coli bacteremia in four hospitals were retrospectively evaluated. The 30-day mortality rates in patients belonging to the ESBL-CF, ESBL-carbapenem, and non-ESBL-CF groups were compared as 2 (empirical and definitive therapy) cohorts. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for mortality were calculated using Cox regression models with weighting according to the inverse probability of propensity scores for receiving CF or carbapenem treatment. The empirical-therapy cohort included 104 patients (ESBL-CF, 26; ESBL-carbapenem, 45; non-ESBL-CF, 33), and the definitive-therapy cohort included 133 patients (ESBL-CF, 59; ESBL-carbapenem, 54; non-ESBL-CF, 20). The crude 30-day mortality rates for patients in the ESBL-CF, ESBL-carbapenem, and non-ESBL-CF groups were, respectively, 7.7%, 8.9%, and 3.0% in the empirical-therapy cohort and 5.1%, 9.3%, and 5.0% in the definitve-therapy cohort. In patients without hematological malignancy and neutropenia, CF treatment for ESBL-EC patients was not associated with mortality compared with carbapenem treatment (empirical-therapy cohort: aHR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 6.52; definitive therapy cohort: aHR, 1.04; CI, 0.24 to 4.49). CF therapy may represent an effective alternative to carbapenem treatment for patients with ESBL-EC bacteremia for empirical and definitive therapy in adult patients who do not have hematological malignancy and neutropenia.
机译:比较了头孢美唑和氟莫昔芬(CF)治疗产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的大肠杆菌(ESBL-EC)菌血症(ESBL-CF组)与碳青霉烯治疗ESBL-EC患者的疗效(非ESBL-EC菌血症的患者(非ESBL-CF组)和CF治疗。对四家医院接受大肠杆菌菌血症治疗的成年患者进行回顾性评估。将属于ESBL-CF,ESBL-carbapenem和非ESBL-CF组的患者的30天死亡率比较为2组(经验性和确定性治疗)。根据接受CF或碳青霉烯治疗的倾向评分的逆概率,使用Cox回归模型加权后计算死亡率的调整后危险比(aHRs)。实证治疗队列包括104例患者(ESBL-CF,26; ESBL-carbapenem,45; non-ESBL-CF,33),最终治疗队列包括133例患者(ESBL-CF,59; ESBL-carbapenem, 54;非ESBL-CF,20)。 ESBL-CF,ESBL-卡培培南和非ESBL-CF组的30天患者的粗略死亡率分别为7.7%,8.9%和3.0%,而经验治疗组分别为5.1%,9.3 %,而在definitve治疗组中则为5.0%。在没有血液系统恶性肿瘤和中性粒细胞减少症的患者中,与碳青霉烯类药物治疗相比,ESBL-EC患者的CF治疗与死亡率无关(经验治疗队列:aHR,0.87; 95%置信区间[CI],0.11至6.52;确定的治疗队列: aHR,1.04; CI,0.24至4.49)。对于没有血液系统恶性肿瘤和嗜中性白血球减少症的成年患者,对于ESBL-EC菌血症患者,CF疗法可能是碳青霉烯治疗的有效替代方案,用于经验性和确定性疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号