首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Association between efficacy and body weight or body mass index for two low-dose oral contraceptives.
【24h】

Association between efficacy and body weight or body mass index for two low-dose oral contraceptives.

机译:两种低剂量口服避孕药的功效与体重或体重指数之间的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: This analysis investigated the association of oral contraceptive efficacy with body weight and body mass index (BMI) for hypothesis-generating purposes. STUDY DESIGN: Data were from a randomized, parallel-group trial of 180/215/250 mcg of norgestimate (NGM)/25 mcg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) (given to 1671 women) and 1 mg of norethindrone acetate (NETA)/20 mcg of EE (given to 1139 women). Pregnancies were evaluated across BMI deciles and by BMI and body weight dichotomies. A Pearl index was calculated for each treatment group. The relative risk (RR) of pregnancy was calculated with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The Pearl index for women who received NGM/EE was 2.36 [95% confidence interval (CI)=1.33-3.40]; for those who received NETA/EE, the Pearl index was 3.29 (95% CI=1.81-4.77). Consistent, weak positive associations between weight and pregnancy risk were found. Overall, for women with a BMI >or=25 kg/m(2) (compared with women with a BMI <25 kg/m(2)), the RR of pregnancy was 1.84 (95% CI=0.98-3.45); that for women who received NGM/EE was 1.39 (95% CI=0.57-3.40), whereas that for women who received NETA/EE was 2.49 (95% CI=1.01-6.13). For women with a body weight >or=70 kg (compared with women with a body weight <70 kg), the RR was 1.25 (95% CI=0.63-2.46); that for women who received NGM/EE was 1.41 (95% CI=0.56-3.54), whereas that for women who received NETA/EE was 1.12 (95% CI=0.40-3.12). CONCLUSION: Women in the higher body weight or BMI category showed a small increase in the risk of pregnancy with these oral contraceptives, but this increase was not statistically significant overall or for either formulation studied.
机译:背景:这项分析调查口服避孕药功效与体重和体重指数(BMI)的关联,以产生假设。研究设计:数据来自于180/215/250 mcg诺孕酯(NGM)/ 25 mcg乙炔雌二醇(EE)(针对1671名妇女)和1 mg乙酸炔诺酮(NETA)/的随机平行分组试验EE 20 mcg(给予1139名妇女)。通过BMI定义和体重二分法对怀孕进行了评估。计算每个治疗组的Pearl指数。用Cox比例风险模型计算怀孕的相对风险(RR)。结果:接受NGM / EE治疗的女性的Pearl指数为2.36 [95%可信区间(CI)= 1.33-3.40]。对于那些接受NETA / EE的人,Pearl指数为3.29(95%CI = 1.81-4.77)。发现体重和怀孕风险之间存在一致的弱正相关性。总体而言,对于BMI≥25 kg / m(2)的女性(与BMI <25 kg / m(2)的女性相比),怀孕的RR为1.84(95%CI = 0.98-3.45)。接受NGM / EE的女性为1.39(95%CI = 0.57-3.40),而接受NETA / EE的女性为2.49(95%CI = 1.01-6.13)。对于体重大于或等于70千克的女性(与体重小于70千克的女性相比),RR为1.25(95%CI = 0.63-2.46)。接受NGM / EE的女性为1.41(95%CI = 0.56-3.54),而接受NETA / EE的女性为1.12(95%CI = 0.40-3.12)。结论:体重较高或BMI类别较高的妇女使用这些口服避孕药的妊娠风险略有增加,但总体而言,无论对于哪种配方研究,这种增加均无统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号