...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Effect of heavy exercise on spectral baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate, and blood pressure variability in well-trained humans
【24h】

Effect of heavy exercise on spectral baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate, and blood pressure variability in well-trained humans

机译:剧烈运动对训练有素的人的频谱压力反射敏感性,心率和血压变异性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

First published July 11, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00003.2008.-The aim of the study was to assess the instantaneous spectral components of heart rate variability (HRV) and systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) and determine the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency baroreflex sensitivity (HF-BRS) during a graded maximal exercise test. The first hypothesis was that the hyper-pnea elicited by heavy exercise could entail a significant increase in HF-SBPV by mechanical effect once the first and second ventilatory thresholds (VTs) were exceeded. It was secondly hypothesized that vagal tone progressively withdrawing with increasing load, HF-BRS could decrease during the exercise test. Fifteen well-trained subjects participated in this study. Electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure, and gas exchanges were recorded during a cycloergometer test. Ventilatory equivalents were computed from gas exchange parameters to assess VTs. Spectral analysis was applied on cardiovascular series to compute RR and systolic blood pressure power spectral densities, cross-spectral coherence, gain, and a index of BRS. Three exercise intensity stages were compared: below (Al), between (A2), and above (A3) VTs. From Al to A3, both HF-SBPV (Al: 45 +- 6, A2: 65 +- 10, and A3: 120 +- 23 mm2Hg, P < 0.001) and HF-HRV increased (Al: 20 +- 5, A2: 23 +- 8, and A3:40 +-11 ms2, P < 0.02), maintaining HF-BRS (gain, Al: 0.68 +- 0.12, A2: 0.63 +- 0.08, and A3: 0.57 +- 0.09; aindex, Al: 0.58 +- 0.08, A2:0.48 +-0.06, and A3: 0.50 +- 0.09 ms/mmHg, not significant). However, LF-BRS decreased (gain, Al: 0.39 +- 0.06, A2: 0.17 +- 0.02, and A3:0.11 +-0.01, P < 0.001; a index, Al: 0.46 +- 0.07, A2: 0.20 +- 0.02, and A3: 0.14 +- 0.01 ms/mmHg, P < 0.001). As expected, once VTs were exceeded, hyperpnea induced a marked increase in both HF-HRV and HF-SBPV. However, this concomitant increase allowed the maintenance of HF-BRS, presumably by a mechanoelectric feedback mechanism.
机译:首次发布于2008年7月11日; doi:10.1152 / ajpheart.00003.2008.-研究的目的是评估心率变异性(HRV)和收缩压变异性(SBPV)的瞬时频谱分量,并确定低频(LF)和高频压力反射分级最大运动测试中的灵敏度(HF-BRS)。第一个假设是,一旦超过第一和第二通气阈值(VTs),通过剧烈运动引起的高呼吸可能导致HF-SBPV通过机械作用显着增加。其次,假设随着运动负荷的增加迷走神经逐渐消失,运动试验期间HF-BRS可能降低。十五名训练有素的受试者参加了这项研究。心电图(ECG),血压和气体交换记录在心率计测试期间。从换气参数计算通气当量,以评估室速。将光谱分析应用于心血管系列,以计算RR和收缩压功率谱密度,互谱相干性,增益和BRS指数。比较了三个运动强度阶段:低于(A1),介于(A2)之间和高于(A3)VT。从Al到A3,HF-SBPV(Al:45 +-6,A2:65 +-10,和A3:120 +-23 mm2Hg,P <0.001)和HF-HRV都增加了(Al:20 +-5, A2:23±8,并且A3:40±-11ms2,P <0.02),维持HF-BRS(增益,A1:0.68±0.12,A2:0.63±0.08,A3:0.57±0.09; aindex:A1:0.58±0.08,A2:0.48±0.06,A3:0.50±0.09ms / mmHg,不显着。然而,LF-BRS下降(增益,Al:0.39 +-0.06,A2:0.17 +-0.02,和A3:0.11 + -0.01,P <0.001;指数,Al:0.46 +-0.07,A2:0.20 +- 0.02和A3:0.14±0.01 ms / mmHg,P <0.001)。正如预期的那样,一旦超过室速,呼吸过度会导致HF-HRV和HF-SBPV明显增加。然而,这种伴随的增加允许维持HF-BRS,大概是通过机电反馈机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号