...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Blunted muscle vasodilatation during chemoreceptor stimulation in patients with heart failure.
【24h】

Blunted muscle vasodilatation during chemoreceptor stimulation in patients with heart failure.

机译:心力衰竭患者化学感受器刺激过程中的钝性血管舒张。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Chemoreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity is exaggerated in heart failure (HF) patients. However, the vascular implications of the augmented sympathetic activity during chemoreceptor activation in patients with HF are unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the muscle blood flow responses during peripheral and central chemoreflex stimulation would be blunted in patients with HF. Sixteen patients with HF (49 +/- 3 years old, Functional Class II-III, New York Heart Association) and 11 age-paired normal controls were studied. The peripheral chemoreflex control was evaluated by inhalation of 10% O(2) and 90% N(2) for 3 min. The central chemoreflex control was evaluated by inhalation of 7% CO(2) and 93% O(2) for 3 min. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was directly evaluated by microneurography. Forearm blood flow was evaluated by venous occlusion plethysmography. Baseline MSNA were significantly greater in HF patients (33 +/- 3 vs. 20 +/- 2 bursts/min, P = 0.001). Forearm vascular conductance(FVC) was not different between the groups. During hypoxia, the increase in MSNA was significantly greater in HF patients than in normal controls (9.0 +/- 1.6 vs. 0.8 +/- 2.0 bursts/min, P = 0.001). The increase in FVC was significantly lower in HF patients (0.00 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.76 +/- 0.25 units, P = 0.001). During hypercapnia, MSNA responses were significantly greater in HF patients than in normal controls (13.9 +/- 3.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.9 bursts/min, P = 0.001). FVC responses were significantly lower in HF patients (-0.29 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.37 +/- 0.18 units, P = 0.001). In conclusion, muscle vasodilatation during peripheral and central chemoreceptor stimulation is blunted in HF patients. This vascular response seems to be explained, at least in part, by the exaggerated MSNA responses during hypoxia and hypercapnia.
机译:心力衰竭(HF)患者夸大了对交感神经活动的化学反射控制。然而,HF患者化学感受器激活过程中增强交感神经活动的血管意义尚不清楚。我们测试了以下假设:HF患者外周和中央化学反射刺激期间的肌肉血流反应会减弱。研究了16例HF患者(49 +/- 3岁,功能性II-III级,纽约心脏协会)和11个年龄配对的正常对照。通过吸入10%O(2)和90%N(2)3分钟来评估周围的化学反射控制。通过吸入7%CO(2)和93%O(2)3分钟来评估中央化学反射控制。通过微神经造影术直接评估肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)。通过静脉阻塞体积描记法评估前臂血流量。 HF患者的基线MSNA明显更高(33 +/- 3 vs. 20 +/- 2突发/分钟,P = 0.001)。两组之间的前臂血管电导(FVC)没有差异。在缺氧期间,HF患者的MSNA升高明显高于正常对照组(9.0 +/- 1.6 vs. 0.8 +/- 2.0突发/分钟,P = 0.001)。 HF患者的FVC升高明显较低(0.00 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.76 +/- 0.25单位,P = 0.001)。在高碳酸血症期间,HF患者的MSNA反应明显高于正常对照组(13.9 +/- 3.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.9突发/分钟,P = 0.001)。 HF患者的FVC反应显着降低(-0.29 +/- 0.10单位与0.37 +/- 0.18单位,P = 0.001)。总之,HF患者在外周和中央化学感受器刺激过程中的肌肉血管舒张作用减弱。这种血管反应似乎至少部分是由缺氧和高碳酸血症期间夸大的MSNA反应所解释的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号