首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Evaluation of nonlinear regression approaches to estimation of insulin sensitivity by the minimal model with reference to Bayesian hierarchical analysis.
【24h】

Evaluation of nonlinear regression approaches to estimation of insulin sensitivity by the minimal model with reference to Bayesian hierarchical analysis.

机译:参考贝叶斯层次分析法,通过最小模型对评估胰岛素敏感性的非线性回归方法进行评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Minimal model analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) glucose and insulin concentrations offers a validated approach to measuring insulin sensitivity, but model identification is not always successful. Improvements may be achieved by using alternative settings in the modeling process, although results may differ according to setting, and care must be exercised in combining results. IVGTT data (12 samples, regular test) from 533 men without diabetes was modeled by the traditional nonlinear regression (NLR) approach, using five different permutations of settings. Results were evaluated with reference to the more robust Bayesian hierarchical (BH) approach to model identification and to the proportion of variance they explained in known correlates of insulin sensitivity (age, BMI, blood pressure, fasting glucose and insulin, serum triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, and uric acid concentration). BH analysis was successful in all cases. With NLR analysis, between 17 and 35 IVGTTs were associated with parameter coefficients of variation (PCVs) for minimal model parameters S(I) (insulin sensitivity) and S(G) (glucose effectiveness) of >100%. Systematic use of each different approach in combination reduced this number to five. Mean (interquartile range) S(I)(NLR) was then 3.14 (2.29-4.63) min(-1).mU(-1).l x 10(-4) and 2.56 (1.74-3.83) min(-1).mU(-1).l x 10(-4) for S(I)(BH) (correlation 0.86, P < 0.0001). S(I)(NLR) explained, on average, 10.6% of the variance in known correlates of insulin sensitivity, whereas S(I)(BH) explained 8.5%. In a large body of data, which BH analysis demonstrated could be fully identified, use of alternative modeling settings in NLR analysis could substantially reduce the number of analyses with PCVs >100%. S(I)(NLR) compared favorably with S(I)(BH) in the proportion of variance explained in known correlates of insulin sensitivity.
机译:静脉内葡萄糖耐量测试(IVGTT)葡萄糖和胰岛素浓度的最小模型分析为测量胰岛素敏感性提供了一种经过验证的方法,但是模型鉴定并不总是成功的。尽管结果可能会因设置而有所不同,但可以通过在建模过程中使用替代设置来实现改进,并且在组合结果时必须格外小心。使用传统的非线性回归(NLR)方法,使用五个不同的排列方式,对来自533名无糖尿病男性的IVGTT数据(12个样本,常规测试)进行了建模。参照更可靠的贝叶斯分层(BH)方法进行模型鉴定以及在已知的胰岛素敏感性相关因素(年龄,BMI,血压,空腹血糖和胰岛素,血清甘油三酯,HDL胆固醇)中解释的方差比例,对结果进行了评估,以及尿酸浓度)。 BH分析在所有情况下均成功。通过NLR分析,在最小模型参数S(I)(胰岛素敏感性)和S(G)(葡萄糖有效性)> 100%的情况下,有17至35个IVGTT与变异系数(PCV)相关。系统地结合使用每种不同的方法可将这一数目减少到五个。平均值(四分位数间距)S(I)(NLR)为3.14(2.29-4.63)min(-1).mU(-1).lx 10(-4)和2.56(1.74-3.83)min(-1) S(I)(BH)为.mU(-1).lx 10(-4)(相关系数0.86,P <0.0001)。 S(I)(NLR)平均解释了胰岛素敏感性已知相关因素方差的10.6%,而S(I)(BH)解释了8.5%。在BH分析表明可以完全识别的大量数据中,在NLR分析中使用替代建模设置可以大大减少PCV> 100%的分析次数。 S(I)(NLR)与S(I)(BH)的比例在胰岛素敏感性的已知相关因素中所解释的方差比例方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号