...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Effect of paced breathing on ventilatory and cardiovascular variability parameters during short-term investigations of autonomic function.
【24h】

Effect of paced breathing on ventilatory and cardiovascular variability parameters during short-term investigations of autonomic function.

机译:在自主功能的短期研究期间,有规律的呼吸对通气和心血管变异性参数的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Paced breathing (PB) around 0.25 Hz has been advocated as a means to avoid confounding and to standardize measurements in short-term investigations of autonomic cardiovascular regulation. Controversy remains, however, as to whether it causes any alteration in autonomic control. We addressed this issue in 40 supine, middle-aged, healthy volunteers by assessing the changes induced by PB (0.25 Hz for 8 min) on 1) ventilatory parameters, 2) the indexes of autonomic control of cardiovascular function, and 3) the spectral indexes of cardiovascular variability. Subjects were grouped into group 1 (n = 31), if spontaneous breathing was regular and within the high-frequency (HF) band (0.15-0.45 Hz), or group 2 (n = 9), if it was irregular or slow (< 0.15 Hz). In both groups, PB was accompanied by an increase in minute ventilation (both groups, P < 0.01), whereas tidal volume increased only in group 1 (P = 0.0003). End-tidal CO2 decreased by [median (lower quartile, upper quartile)] -0.2 (-0.5, -0.1)% (group 1, P< 0.0001) and -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)% (group 2, P = 0.008). Mean R-R interval and systolic and diastolic pressure remained remarkably stable (all P > or = 0.13, both groups). No significant changes were observed in spectral indexes of R-R and pressure variability (all P > or = 0.12, measured only in group 1 to avoid confounding), except in the HF power of pressure signals, which significantly increased (all P < 0.05) in association with increased tidal volume. In conclusion, PB at 0.25 Hz causes a slight hyperventilation and does not affect traditional indexes of autonomic control or, in subjects with spontaneous breathing in the HF band, most relevant spectral indexes of cardiovascular variability. These findings support the notion that PB does not alter cardiovascular autonomic regulation compared with spontaneous breathing.
机译:在自主性心血管调节的短期研究中,人们提倡采用0.25 Hz左右的步速呼吸(PB)来避免混淆和标准化测量。然而,关于它是否引起自主控制的任何改变仍存在争议。我们通过评估PB(0.25 Hz持续8分钟)在1)呼吸参数,2)自主控制心血管功能的指标以及3)频谱上引起的PB变化(40位仰卧,中年,健康志愿者)解决了这个问题心血管变异指数。如果自发呼吸规则并且在高频(HF)频带(0.15-0.45 Hz)内,则将受试者分为第1组(n = 31),如果不规则或缓慢则将其分为第2组(n = 9)。 <0.15 Hz)。在两组中,PB均伴随着分钟通气量的增加(两组,P <0.01),而潮气量仅在组1中增加(P = 0.0003)。潮气末CO2减少了[中位数(下四分位数,上四分位数)] -0.2(-0.5,-0.1)%(组1,P <0.0001)和-0.6(-0.8,-0.5)%(组2,P = 0.008)。平均R-R间隔和收缩压和舒张压均保持显着稳定(两组均P均≥0.13)。除了压力信号的HF功率显着增加(所有P <0.05)之外,在RR的频谱指数和压力变化方面没有观察到显着变化(所有P>或= 0.12,仅在第1组中进行测量以避免混淆)。与潮气量增加有关。总之,0.25 Hz的PB会引起轻微的换气过度,并且不会影响传统的自主神经控制指标,或者在HF波段自发呼吸的受试者中,不会影响心血管变异的最相关光谱指标。这些发现支持以下观点:与自发呼吸相比,PB不会改变心血管自主调节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号