首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >In search of an optimized supplemental lighting spectrum for greenhouse tomato production with intracanopy lighting
【24h】

In search of an optimized supplemental lighting spectrum for greenhouse tomato production with intracanopy lighting

机译:寻找具有棚内照明的温室番茄生产的最佳补充照明光谱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With anticipated energy-efficiency improvements and ever-improving light-distribution architectures, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are a promising alternative to current supplemental lighting (SL) technologies for greenhouse crop production. Yet, significant questions remain regarding how to best optimize spectral-quality effects on plant growth and development using LEDs in the greenhouse. The objective of this study was to compare different spectra of intracanopy (IC) SL using LEDs for high-wire greenhouse tomato [Solatium lycopersicum 'Merlice') production in a mid-northern climate during a winter-to-summer production cycle. Five lighting treatments were evaluated: solar light only (control); solar light + SL from IC-LED towers using different percentages of blue, red and/or far-red light: 10B-90R; 30B-70R; 25B-60R-15FR; or 80R-20FR, where B refers to blue (450 nm), R refers to red (627 nm), and FR refers to far-red (730 nm). A constant photon flux of 180 umol nv2 s1 was provided to all plants grownwith SL for 16 h d1. In general, light quality from SL did not affect weekly plant-growth measurements (leaf length and stem elongation), relative chlorophyll content (RCC), or plant productivity (fruit number and total fruit FW), but significantly altered leaf photosynthesis and abaxial stomatal density (SD) and index (SI). Although leaves grown with 25B-60R-15FR had higher stomatal conductance [gs) man all other treatments, their abaxial stomatal features were only ~87% those of leaves grown with 10B-90R. Leaf chlorophyll content was up to 11% higher for plants grown under any kind of SL compared to unsupplemented controls. Similarly, total fruit yield was higher for SL treatments relative to the control. The consequences and perspectives of using different light-quality treatments in the SL spectrum will be discussed.
机译:随着预期的能源效率的提高和光分配架构的不断改进,发光二极管(LED)是目前用于温室作物生产的补充照明(SL)技术的有希望的替代品。然而,关于如何使用温室中的LED来最佳地优化光谱质量对植物生长和发育的影响,仍然存在重大问题。这项研究的目的是比较在冬季到夏季生产周期中,在中北部气候下使用LED生产高线温室番茄[Solyium lycopersicum'Merlice']的冠层内(IC)SL的不同光谱。评价了五种照明处理:仅太阳能(对照);来自IC-LED塔的太阳能灯+ SL,使用不同百分比的蓝色,红色和/或远红色光:10B-90R; 30B-70R; 25B-60R-15FR;或80R-20FR,其中B表示蓝色(450 nm),R表示红色(627 nm),FR表示远红色(730 nm)。向使用SL生长16 h d1的所有植物提供180 umol nv2 s1的恒定光子通量。通常,SL的光质量不会影响每周的植物生长测量(叶长和茎伸长),相对叶绿素含量(RCC)或植物生产力(果实数量和总果实FW),但会显着改变叶片的光合作用和背气孔。密度(SD)和指数(SI)。尽管在所有其他处理下,用25B-60R-15FR培育的叶片具有更高的气孔导度[gs],但它们的背面气孔特征仅为用10B-90R培育的叶片的约87%。与未添加对照的植物相比,在任何一种SL条件下生长的植物的叶绿素含量都高出11%。同样,相对于对照,SL处理的总果实产量更高。将讨论在SL光谱中使用不同光质量处理的后果和前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号