...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Engineering World >The Next Best Pump Still Cannot Compare
【24h】

The Next Best Pump Still Cannot Compare

机译:次佳泵仍无法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Even the most efficient competing AODD pump was significantly less efficient when compared to the Wilden Pro-Flo SHIFT during side-by-side testing. The electronically - controlled Pump B in the white paper comparison required the following to maintain the same condition of service as the Wilden Pro-Flo SHIFT: 1. 16% more air and strokes 2. 30 additional strokes per minute 3. 6.9 SCFM more air consumption When you analyse the need for higher energy consumption, more strokes with subsequent wear and tear for maintenance, and less overall fluid volume moved per SCFM of air flow, it is impressive to find that, while Pump B's ADS is electronically monitored and controlled, it still requires more air for less fluid flow rate and therefore delivers a less productive yield than the mechanically actuated Pro-Flo SHIFT.
机译:与Wilden Pro-Flo SHIFT进行并排测试时,即使是最高效的竞争AODD泵,其效率也大大降低。在白皮书比较中,电子控制的泵B需要以下各项来保持与Wilden Pro-Flo SHIFT相同的服务条件:1.空气和冲程增加16%2.每分钟增加30个冲程3.空气增加6.9 SCFM消耗当您分析对更高的能耗,更多的冲程以及随后的磨损进行维护以及每SCFM空气流移动的总流体量减少的需求时,令人印象深刻的是,虽然Pump B的ADS受到电子监控,与机械驱动的Pro-Flo SHIFT相比,它仍然需要更多的空气以减少流体流量,因此生产率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号