...
首页> 外文期刊>Biometrics: Journal of the Biometric Society : An International Society Devoted to the Mathematical and Statistical Aspects of Biology >Covariate adjustment and ranking methods to identify regions with high and low mortality rates.
【24h】

Covariate adjustment and ranking methods to identify regions with high and low mortality rates.

机译:协变量调整和排序方法以识别死亡率高和低的区域。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Identifying regions with the highest and lowest mortality rates and producing the corresponding color-coded maps help epidemiologists identify promising areas for analytic etiological studies. Based on a two-stage Poisson-Gamma model with covariates, we use information on known risk factors, such as smoking prevalence, to adjust mortality rates and reveal residual variation in relative risks that may reflect previously masked etiological associations. In addition to covariate adjustment, we study rankings based on standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), empirical Bayes (EB) estimates, and a posterior percentile ranking (PPR) method and indicate circumstances that warrant the more complex procedures in order to obtain a high probability of correctly classifying the regions with the upper 100gamma% and lower 100gamma% of relative risks for gamma= 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2. We also give analytic approximations to the probabilities of correctly classifying regions in the upper 100gamma% of relative risks for these three ranking methods. Using data on mortality from heart disease, we found that adjustment for smoking prevalence has an important impact on which regions are classified as high and low risk. With such a common disease, all three ranking methods performed comparably. However, for diseases with smaller event counts, such as cancers, and wide variation in event counts among regions, EB and PPR methods outperform ranking based on SMRs.
机译:识别死亡率最高和最低的区域并制作相应的颜色编码图有助于流行病学家确定有希望的病因学研究领域。基于带有协变量的两阶段Poisson-Gamma模型,我们使用已知风险因素(例如吸烟率)的信息来调整死亡率,并揭示相对风险的残留变化,这些变化可能反映了以前掩盖的病因学关联。除了协变量调整之外,我们还基于标准化死亡率(SMR),经验贝叶斯(EB)估计值和后验百分等级(PPR)方法研究排名,并指出需要更复杂程序才能获得较高可能性的情况正确地对伽玛分别为0.05、0.1和0.2的相对危险度的上100gamma%和下100gamma%的区域进行分类。对于这三种排序方法,我们还对正确分类区域的概率(相对风险的较高100%)给出了解析近似值。使用心脏病死亡率数据,我们发现吸烟率的调整对哪些地区被划分为高风险和低风险具有重要影响。在这种常见疾病中,这三种排名方法的表现均相当。但是,对于事件计数较小的疾病(例如癌症)以及区域之间事件计数的巨大差异,EB和PPR方法的性能优于基于SMR的排名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号