...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood: The Journal of the American Society of Hematology >Dexamethasone plus rituximab yields higher sustained response rates than dexamethasone monotherapy in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia.
【24h】

Dexamethasone plus rituximab yields higher sustained response rates than dexamethasone monotherapy in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

机译:在原发性免疫性血小板减少症的成年人中,地塞米松加利妥昔单抗的持续缓解率高于地塞米松单一疗法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous observational studies suggest that rituximab may be useful in the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This randomized trial investigated rituximab efficacy in previously untreated adult ITP patients with a platelet count of 20 x 10(9)/L or less. One hundred three patients were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d dexamethasone for 4 days with or without 375 mg/m(2) rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. Patients who were refractory to dexamethasone alone received salvage therapy with dexamethasone plus rituximab. Sustained response (ie, platelet count > or = 50 x 10(9)/L at month 6 after treatment initiation), evaluable in 101 patients, was greater in patients treated with dexamethasone plus rituximab (n = 49) than in those treated with dexamethasone alone (n = 52; 63% vs 36%, P = .004, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.079-0.455). Patients in the experimental arm showed increased incidences of grade 3 to 4 adverse events (10% vs 2%, P = .082, 95% CI, -0.010 to 0.175), but incidences of serious adverse events were similar in both arms (6% vs 2%, P = .284, 95% CI, -0.035 to 0.119). Dexamethasone plus rituximab was an effective salvage therapy in 56% of patients refractory to dexamethasone. The combination of dexamethasone and rituximab improved platelet counts compared with dexamethasone alone. Thus, combination therapy may represent an effective treatment option before splenectomy. This study is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00770562.
机译:先前的观察性研究表明,利妥昔单抗可能在治疗原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)中有用。该随机试验研究了利妥昔单抗在先前未经治疗的成人ITP患者中的血小板计数为20 x 10(9)/ L或更少的功效。一百零三名患者被随机分配接受40 mg / d地塞米松治疗4天,每周接受或不接受375 mg / m(2)利妥昔单抗治疗4周。仅对地塞米松难治的患者接受了地塞米松加利妥昔单抗的挽救治疗。持续反应(即治疗开始后第6个月血小板计数>或= 50 x 10(9)/ L)在101例患者中评估为好,地塞米松加利妥昔单抗治疗的患者(n = 49)比用地塞米松+利妥昔单抗治疗的患者高单独使用地塞米松(n = 52; 63%vs 36%,P = .004,95%置信区间[95%CI],0.079-0.455)。实验组的患者显示3至4级不良事件的发生率增加(10%vs 2%,P = .082,95%CI,-0.010至0.175),但两组的严重不良事件的发生率相似(6 %vs 2%,P = .284,95%CI,-0.035至0.119)。地塞米松加利妥昔单抗是难治性地塞米松患者的56%。与单独使用地塞米松相比,地塞米松和利妥昔单抗的组合可改善血小板计数。因此,在脾切除术之前,联合治疗可能是一种有效的治疗选择。该研究在http://clinicaltrials.gov上注册为NCT00770562。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号