...
首页> 外文期刊>Bioresource Technology: Biomass, Bioenergy, Biowastes, Conversion Technologies, Biotransformations, Production Technologies >Life cycle assessment of two emerging sewage sludge-to-energy systems: Evaluating energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of two emerging sewage sludge-to-energy systems: Evaluating energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications

机译:两种新兴的污水污泥转化为能源系统的生命周期评估:评估能源和温室气体排放的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A " cradle-to-grave" life cycle assessment was conducted to examine the energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission footprints of two emerging sludge-to-energy systems. One system employs a combination of anaerobic digestion (AD) and fast pyrolysis for bioenergy conversion, while the other excludes AD. Each system was divided into five process phases: plant construction, sludge pretreatment, sludge-to-bioenergy conversion, bioenergy utilizations and biochar management. Both systems achieved energy and GHG emission benefits, and the AD-involving system performed better than the AD-excluding system (5.30 vs. 0.63GJ/t sludge in net energy gain and 0.63 vs. 0.47t CO_2eq/t sludge in emission credit for base case). Detailed contribution and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify how and to what degree the different life-cycle phases are responsible for the energy and emission impacts. The energy and emission performances were significantly affected by variations in bioenergy production, energy requirement for sludge drying and end use of bioenergy.
机译:进行了“从摇篮到坟墓”的生命周期评估,以检查两种新兴污泥到能源系统的能源和温室气体(GHG)排放足迹。一种系统采用厌氧消化(AD)和快速热解的组合来进行生物能转化,而另一种系统则不包括AD。每个系统分为五个过程阶段:工厂建设,污泥预处理,污泥到生物能转化,生物能利用和生物炭管理。两种系统均实现了能源和温室气体排放效益,涉及AD的系统的表现要优于不含AD的系统(净能源收益中的5.30 vs. 0.63GJ / t污泥,排放信用中0.63 vs.0.47t CO_2eq / t污泥)。基本情况)。进行了详细的贡献和敏感性分析,以确定不同生命周期阶段对能源和排放影响的影响方式和程度。能源和排放性能受到生物能源生产,污泥干燥的能源需求和生物能源最终用途变化的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号