首页> 外文期刊>Contact dermatitis >Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
【24h】

Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.

机译:使用局部淋巴结测定法对丙烯酸酯(丙烯酸甲酯,丙烯酸乙酯,丙烯酸丁酯和丙烯酸乙基己酯)的皮肤致敏能力进行比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are currently available no systematic experimental data on the skin sensitizing properties of acrylates that are of relevance in occupational settings. Limited information from previous guinea-pig tests or from the local lymph node assay (LLNA) is available; however, these data are incomplete and somewhat contradictory. For those reasons, we have examined in the LLNA 4 acrylates: butyl acrylate (BA), ethyl acrylate (EA), methyl acrylate (MA), and ethylhexyl acrylate (EHA). The LLNA data indicated that all 4 compounds have some potential to cause skin sensitization. In addition, the relative potencies of these acrylates were measured by derivation from LLNA dose-response analyses of EC3 values (the effective concentration of chemical required to induce a threefold increase in proliferation of draining lymph node cells compared with control values). On the basis of 1 scheme for the categorization of skin sensitization potency, BA, EA, and MA were each classified as weak sensitizers. Using the same scheme, EHA was considered a moderate sensitizer. However, it must be emphasized that the EC3 value for this chemical of 9.7% is on the borderline between moderate (<10%) and weak (>10%) categories. Thus, the judicious view is that all 4 chemicals possess relatively weak skin sensitizing potential.
机译:目前尚无关于与职业环境有关的丙烯酸酯的皮肤致敏特性的系统实验数据。从以前的豚鼠试验或局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)获得的信息有限;但是,这些数据是不完整的,有些矛盾。由于这些原因,我们在LLNA 4丙烯酸酯中进行了检查:丙烯酸丁酯(BA),丙烯酸乙酯(EA),丙烯酸甲酯(MA)和丙烯酸乙基己酯(EHA)。 LLNA数据表明,所有4种化合物都有一定的潜力引起皮肤过敏。此外,这些丙烯酸酯的相对效力是通过对EC3值(诱导引流性淋巴结细胞增殖的三倍增长所需的化学物质的有效浓度与对照值相比)进行LLNA剂量响应分析得出的,来测量它们的相对效力。基于皮肤敏化效力分类的一种方案,BA,EA和MA分别归为弱敏化剂。使用相同的方案,EHA被认为是中等敏化剂。但是,必须强调的是,该化学品的EC3值为9.7%,处于中等(<10%)和弱(> 10%)类别之间的边界。因此,明智的看法是所有这四种化学物质都具有相对较弱的皮肤致敏能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号