首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Detection of small amounts of human adenoviruses in stools: comparison of a new immuno real-time PCR assay with classical tools
【24h】

Detection of small amounts of human adenoviruses in stools: comparison of a new immuno real-time PCR assay with classical tools

机译:粪便中少量人腺病毒的检测:新型免疫实时PCR检测与经典工具的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The detection of low virus concentrations in biological matrices, especially stool samples, is facing significant limitations as far as common diagnostic methods (enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)) are considered. Here the development of a new immuno real-time PCR (iPCR) is described and its performance in the detection of human adenoviruses (HAdVs) in spiked stools is compared with those of ELISA and qPCR assays. For the iPCR, detection of the sandwich formed by the complexation of capture antibody-antigen-detection antibody was performed by qPCR thanks to the substitution of peroxydase by a chimeric DNA. This modification increased the detection sensitivity 200-fold compared to ELISA. The direct qPCR results revealed that only 0.3-9.5% of the spiked HAdV were detectable, resulting from important losses of DNA occurring at the extraction step. This step was not necessary in the iPCR workflow, avoiding this drawback. The losses of viral particles occurred at the elution step from the stool only. The recovery rate of the iPCR was thus better and ranged between 21 and 54%. As a result, iPCR enabled the detection of lower virus concentrations in stool samples compared to those detected by ELISA and qPCR. The iPCR could be considered as a hyper sensitive ELISA' for early detection of HAdV infections, especially in the case of immunocompromised patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplant.
机译:考虑到常用的诊断方法(酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)或定量实时PCR(qPCR)),在生物基质(尤其是粪便样品)中检测低病毒浓度面临着重大限制。这里描述了一种新的免疫实时PCR(iPCR)的发展,并将其在加标粪便中检测人腺病毒(HAdV)的性能与ELISA和qPCR分析的性能进行了比较。对于iPCR,由于过氧化物酶被嵌合DNA取代,因此通过qPCR检测由捕获抗体-抗原检测抗体复合形成的三明治。与ELISA相比,这种修饰将检测灵敏度提高了200倍。直接qPCR结果表明,只有0.3-9.5%的加标HAdV可检测到,这是由于提取步骤中发生的DNA大量损失所致。在iPCR工作流程中无需执行此步骤,从而避免了此缺点。病毒颗粒的损失仅发生在从粪便洗脱的步骤中。因此,iPCR的回收率更好,介于21%至54%之间。结果,与通过ELISA和qPCR检测到的病毒浓度相比,iPCR能够检测出粪便样品中较低的病毒浓度。 iPCR可被认为是HAdV感染的早期检测的超灵敏ELISA,特别是在造血干细胞移植后免疫受损的患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号