首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Contribution of new diagnostic approaches to antifungal treatment plans in high-risk haematology patients.
【24h】

Contribution of new diagnostic approaches to antifungal treatment plans in high-risk haematology patients.

机译:对高危血液病患者抗真菌治疗计划的新诊断方法的贡献。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In high-risk patient cohorts, such as patients after solid-organ or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, or patients with acute leukaemia, early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is essential, as delayed or missing diagnosis of IFI results in increasing rates of mortality. However, diagnosis of most IFIs, especially of invasive aspergillosis, is difficult because classic tests have low sensitivity and specificity, and radiology often provides non-specific and transient results. The limited sensitivity and specificity of conventional assays for the detection of IFI and the growing number of immunocompromised patients who are at risk for opportunistic fungal infections have led to the development of new assays. These methods include antigen detection systems, such as ELISAs, and different molecular methods (PCR assays). Serological tests, such as the detection of the carbohydrate galactomannan, are standardised and commercially available. However, they still need to be evaluated in large patient cohorts, especially children. The benefit of antibody detection remains unclear if patients are under immune suppression or are heavily colonised but not infected. A range of different PCR assays (conventional, nested, real-time) have been developed, targeting different gene regions (cytochrome P450, heat-shock proteins, 18S, 5.8S, 28S, internal transcribed spacer), including a variety of amplicon detection methods, such as gel electrophoresis, hybridisation with specific probes, ELISA and restriction fragment length polymorphism. These molecular assays provide high potential in terms of sensitivity and specificity, but vary widely in their feasibility and up to now have not been standardised. Taken together, new non-culture-based diagnostic assays are appropriate as simple and rapid screening tests with high sensitivities and quick turnaround times. Thus, they might help to reduce empirical antifungal therapy and might be valuable tools to allow early initiation and monitoring of pre-emptive antifungal therapy. In this review, we assess the performance of a variety of non-culture-based tests for the detection of IFI in high-risk haematological patients, with emphasis on the impact of the assays on different management strategies.
机译:在高风险患者队列中,例如实体器官或同种异体干细胞移植后的患者或急性白血病的患者,浸润性真菌感染(IFI)的早期诊断至关重要,因为IFI诊断的延迟或缺失会导致发病率上升死亡率。但是,由于传统检测的敏感性和特异性较低,并且放射学通常提供非特异性和短暂的结果,因此大多数IFI的诊断非常困难,尤其是侵袭性曲霉病。传统检测IFI的检测方法的灵敏度和特异性有限,并且存在机会真菌感染风险的免疫功能低下患者的数量不断增加,导致了新检测方法的发展。这些方法包括抗原检测系统(例如ELISA)和不同的分子方法(PCR分析)。血清学测试,例如碳水化合物半乳甘露聚糖的检测,已经标准化并且可以商购。但是,仍然需要在大型患者队列(尤其是儿童)中对它们进行评估。如果患者处于免疫抑制状态或被严重定植但未被感染,抗体检测的好处尚不清楚。已经开发了针对不同基因区域(细胞色素P450,热休克蛋白,18S,5.8S,28S,内部转录间隔子)的一系列不同的PCR检测(常规,嵌套,实时),包括各种扩增子检测方法,例如凝胶电泳,与特定探针的杂交,ELISA和限制性片段长度多态性。这些分子测定法在敏感性和特异性方面提供了很高的潜力,但其可行性差异很大,到目前为止尚未标准化。综上所述,新的基于非培养物的诊断分析方法适合作为具有高灵敏度和快速周转时间的简单快速筛查测试。因此,它们可能有助于减少经验性的抗真菌治疗,并且可能是使早期启动和监测先发性抗真菌治疗的有价值的工具。在这篇综述中,我们评估了各种非基于文化的测试在高危血液病患者中检测IFI的性能,重点是分析对不同管理策略的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号