...
首页> 外文期刊>Combustion theory and modelling >Tabulated chemistry approaches for laminar flames: Evaluation of flame-prolongation of ILDM and flamelet methods
【24h】

Tabulated chemistry approaches for laminar flames: Evaluation of flame-prolongation of ILDM and flamelet methods

机译:层状火焰的列表化学方法:ILDM的火焰延伸评估和小火焰方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study considers the performance of tabulation methods for numerical simulation of complex chemical kinetics in laminar combusting flows and compares their predictions to results obtained by direct calculation. Two tabulation methods are considered: the Flame Prolongation of Intrinsic low-dimensional manifold (FPI) method and Steady Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM). The FPI method is of current interest as it is a potentially unifying approach capable of dealing with both premixed and non-premixed flames for gaseous fuels. SLFM tabulation methods are popular for non-premixed flames and form a good basis for comparing the performance of the FPI approach. The performance of each method is also evaluated by comparing the results to the direct simulation of the laminar flames using two chemical kinetic schemes: simplified chemistry involving five species and one reaction and detailed chemistry involving 53 species and 325 reaction steps. As part of the evaluation process, the computational cost of each method is also assessed. The laminar flames considered in this study include: freely propagating laminar premixed flames, a two-dimensional axisymmetric methane-air opposed-jet diffusion flame, and a two-dimensional axisymmetric methane-air co-flow diffusion flame. Both tabulation methods are implemented in a parallel adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) framework for solving the complete set of governing partial differential equations. These equations are solved using a fully-coupled finite-volume formulation on body-fitted multi-block quadrilateral mesh. Significant improvements in terms of reduced computational requirements, as measured by both storage and processing time, are demonstrated for the tabulated methods.
机译:本研究考虑了用于层流燃烧流中复杂化学动力学数值模拟的制表方法的性能,并将其预测结果与通过直接计算获得的结果进行了比较。考虑了两种制表方法:本征低维流形的火焰扩展(FPI)方法和稳态层流小火焰模型(SLFM)。 FPI方法是当前关注的问题,因为它是一种潜在的统一方法,能够处理气体燃料的预混火焰和非预混火焰。 SLFM制表方法在非预混火焰中很流行,并且为比较FPI方法的性能奠定了良好的基础。通过将结果与使用两种化学动力学方案直接模拟层流火焰进行比较,还可以评估每种方法的性能:简化的化学反应涉及5种物质和一种反应,详细的化学反应涉及53种物质和325个反应步骤。作为评估过程的一部分,还评估了每种方法的计算成本。本研究中考虑的层流火焰包括:自由传播的层流预混火焰,二维轴对称甲烷-空气对流喷射扩散火焰和二维轴对称甲烷-空气同流扩散火焰。两种制表方法均在并行自适应网格细化(AMR)框架中实现,用于求解控制偏微分方程的完整集合。这些方程是在人体拟合的多块四边形网格上使用完全耦合的有限体积公式求解的。对于列表方法,通过存储和处理时间来衡量,在减少计算需求方面取得了显着改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号