...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS spectrums >Augmentative transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in poor responder depressed patients: A follow-up study
【24h】

Augmentative transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in poor responder depressed patients: A follow-up study

机译:不良反应性抑郁症患者的经颅经颅直流电刺激(tDCS):一项随访研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neurostimulation technique that has received increasing interest in the area of mood disorders over the last several years. While acute, double-blind, sham-controlled studies have already reported positive findings in terms of efficacy and safety for tDCS, follow-up data are lacking. This need prompted the present follow-up study, which assesses post-acute effects of tDCS (no maintenance stimulation was performed), in the mid-term, in a sample of major depressives. Methods After completing an acute, open trial of tDCS, 23 outpatients with either major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder entered a naturalistic follow-up (T1) with clinical evaluations at one week (T2), 1 month (T3), and 3 months (T4). A quantitative analysis of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total scores, through repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (T1-T4) and paired t-test for comparing specific time points (T1-T2, T2-T3, and T3-T4), was performed. In addition, a qualitative analysis on the basis of treatment response and remission (HAM-D) was performed. Results Even though a progressive reduction of follow-up completers was observed from T2 to T4 (95.6% at T2, 65.2% at T3, and 47.8% at T4), the antidepressant effects of acute tDCS persisted over 3 months in almost half of the sample. Of note, no post-acute side effects emerged during the follow-up observation. The most frequent causes of drop-out from this study included major modifications in therapeutic regimen (30%) and poor adherence to follow-up visits (17%). Conclusions In this mid-term, open, follow-up study, tDCS showed mixed results. Further controlled studies are urgently needed to assess its effects beyond the acute phase.
机译:目的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性的神经刺激技术,在过去的几年中,人们对情绪障碍领域的兴趣日益浓厚。虽然急性,双盲,假手术对照研究已经报告了tDCS疗效和安全性方面的积极发现,但缺乏随访数据。这种需求促使当前的后续研究对中期抑郁症样本中的tDCS的急性后效应(未进行维持刺激)进行评估。方法在完成tDCS的急性,开放试验后,对23名重度抑郁症或双相情感障碍患者进行了自然随访(T1),并在一周(T2),1个月(T3)和3个月( T4)。通过重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)(T1-T4),对汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D),蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)和青年躁狂症量表(YMRS)总分进行定量分析。进行了配对t检验以比较特定时间点(T1-T2,T2-T3和T3-T4)。另外,基于治疗反应和缓解(HAM-D)进行了定性分析。结果尽管观察到随访完成者从T2到T4逐渐减少(T2为95.6%,T3为65.2%,T4为47.8%),但急性tDCS的抗抑郁作用持续了3个月以上,几乎持续了一半。样品。值得注意的是,在随访观察中没有出现急性后副作用。这项研究导致辍学的最常见原因包括治疗方案的重大改变(30%)和对随访的依从性差(17%)。结论在这项中期,开放,后续研究中,tDCS显示出好坏参半。迫切需要进一步的对照研究来评估其在急性期以外的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号