首页> 外文期刊>Community dentistry and oral epidemiology >Private dentists assess treatment required as more extensive, demanding and costly, than public sector dentists
【24h】

Private dentists assess treatment required as more extensive, demanding and costly, than public sector dentists

机译:与公共部门的牙医相比,私人牙医评估所需治疗的范围更广,要求更高且成本更高

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate whether contracted private practitioners assess required treatment more extensive, demanding and economically more rewarding than mainly salaried public sector dentists and to estimate the cost consequences of using these alternative providers. Methods: All dental services included in comprehensive treatments funded by the city of Turku and provided to adult patients during the year 2009 were recorded. Patients were distributed randomly without any determination of treatment needs before appointing them to different dentists. Treatment courses for 7432 patients in public clinics included 63 906 procedures and for 2932 patients assigned to treatment by contracted private practitioners included 21 194 procedures. Public sector dentists were mainly salaried with production incentives, and private practitioners worked purely on a fee-for-service basis. The cost estimates were based on the distributions of competence classifications recorded by the providers, which also formed the basis for reimbursement. Results: For each studied treatment category with more than one competence classification, private contractors were less likely than their public sector counterparts to give an assessment of simple or less demanding: 8% versus 29% of examinations, 46% versus 69% of periodontal treatments, 63% versus 85% of extractions, 31% versus 46% of fillings, 18% versus 35% of root canals. The excess cost to society varied from 7.0% for root canal treatments to 21.3% for extractions, causing on average 14.4% higher cost level from use of private practitioners compared with public sector dentists. Conclusions: Private practitioners systematically classified the treatment procedures they provided as more demanding, and therefore more economically rewarding, than their public sector counterparts. The findings indicate that the costs of publicly funded dental care may be increased by the use of private dental contractors.
机译:目标:目的是评估合同制私人执业医师是否比主要受薪的公共部门牙医评估所需治疗的范围更广,要求更高并且在经济上得到更多回报,并评估使用这些替代服务提供商的成本后果。方法:记录所有由图尔库市资助并于2009年向成年患者提供的全面治疗中的牙科服务。将患者随机分配,没有任何治疗需求的决定,然后再任命他们去看不同的牙医。在公共诊所为7432名患者进行的治疗课程包括63 906项程序,而由签约私人执业医生分配给2932例患者的治疗课程包括21 194项程序。公营部门的牙医主要受到生产激励措施的薪水,而私人执业者则纯粹是按服务收费的方式工作。费用概算基于提供者记录的能力类别分布,这也构成了报销的基础。结果:对于每种研究的具有一种以上能力分类的治疗类别,私人承包商比其公共部门同行进行简单或要求较低的评估的可能性更低:8%对29%的检查,46%对69%的牙周治疗分别是拔牙的63%和85%,牙髓的31%和46%,根管的18%和35%。社会的超额费用从根管治疗的7.0%到拔牙的21.3%不等,与公立部门的牙医相比,私人执业医生的使用平均使成本高出14.4%。结论:私人执业医生系统地将他们提供的治疗程序归类为比公共部门的同等要求更高,因此在经济上也更具回报。调查结果表明,通过使用私人牙科承包商可能会增加公共资助的牙科护理的费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号