首页> 外文期刊>Complementary therapies in medicine >Hypnotherapy is more effective than nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: Results of a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Hypnotherapy is more effective than nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: Results of a randomized controlled trial

机译:在戒烟方面,催眠疗法比尼古丁替代疗法更有效:一项随机对照试验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The efficacy of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation is well documented. However, due to relapse rates and side effects, hypnotherapy is gaining attention as an alternative treatment option. The aim of this one-center randomized study was to compare the efficacy of hypnotherapy alone, as well as hypnotherapy with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), to conventional NRT in patients hospitalized with a cardiac or pulmonary illness. Methods: We evaluated self-reported and biochemically verified 7-day prevalence smoking abstinence rates at 12 and 26 weeks post-hospitalization. Patients (n= 164) were randomized into one of three counseling-based treatment groups: NRT for 30 days (NRT; n= 41), a 90-min hypnotherapy session (H; n= 39), and NRT with hypnotherapy (HNRT; n= 37). Treatment groups were compared to a "self-quit" group of 35 patients who refused intervention. Results: Hypnotherapy patients were more likely than NRT patients to be nonsmokers at 12 weeks (43.9% vs. 28.2%; p= 0.14) and 26 weeks after hospitalization (36.6% vs. 18.0%; p= 0.06). Smoking abstinence rates in the HNRT group were similar to the H group. There was no difference in smoking abstinence rates at 26 weeks between "self quit" and participants in any of the treatment groups. In multivariable regression analysis adjusting for diagnosis and demographic characteristics, H and HNRT were over three times more likely than NRT participants to abstain at 26-weeks post-discharge (RR. = 3.6; p= 0.03 and RR. = 3.2; p= 0.04, respectively). Conclusion: Hypnotherapy is more effective than NRT in improving smoking abstinence in patients hospitalized for a smoking-related illness, and could be an asset to post-discharge smoking cessation programs.
机译:背景:药物疗法对戒烟的功效已得到充分证明。但是,由于复发率高和副作用大,催眠疗法已成为替代疗法。这项单中心随机研究的目的是比较在心脏或肺部疾病住院患者中单独进行催眠治疗以及尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)进行的催眠治疗的疗效。方法:我们评估了自我报告并经过生化检查的住院后12周和26周的7天流行戒烟率。将患者(n = 164)随机分为三个基于咨询的治疗组之一:NRT为期30天(NRT; n = 41),90分钟的催眠治疗(H; n = 39)和NRT并进行催眠治疗(HNRT) ; n = 37)。将治疗组与拒绝干预的35名患者的“自我戒断”组进行了比较。结果:催眠治疗患者比NRT患者在住院12周和住院后26周(43.9%vs. 28.2%; p = 0.14)和不吸烟者更有可能(36.6%vs. 18.0%; p = 0.06)。 HNRT组的戒烟率与H组相似。 “自我戒烟”者与任何治疗组的参与者在26周时的戒烟率没有差异。在针对诊断和人口统计学特征进行了调整的多变量回归分析中,出院后26周,H和HNRT戒除的可能性是NRT参与者的三倍以上(RR。= 3.6; p = 0.03和RR。= 3.2; p = 0.04 , 分别)。结论:催眠疗法比NRT在改善因吸烟相关疾病住院的患者的戒烟方面更有效,并且可以作为出院后戒烟计划的资产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号