...
首页> 外文期刊>Community dentistry and oral epidemiology >Measuring socio-economic inequalities in edentate Scottish adults - Cross-sectional analyses using Scottish Health Surveys 1995-2008/09
【24h】

Measuring socio-economic inequalities in edentate Scottish adults - Cross-sectional analyses using Scottish Health Surveys 1995-2008/09

机译:测量受过教育的苏格兰成年人的社会经济不平等-使用1995-2008 / 09苏格兰健康调查进行横断面分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives To investigate the appropriateness of different measures of socio-economic inequalities, in relation to adult oral health in Scotland, utilizing data from a series of large, representative population surveys. Methods The Scottish Health Surveys (SHeS) (1995; 1998; 2003; 2008/09) are cross-sectional national population-based surveys used to monitor health status in those living in private households. The age groups included in this study are as follows: 45-54; 55-64 years: all survey years; 65-74: 1998 onwards; 75+: 2003 onwards. Primary outcome was no natural teeth (edentulism). Three measures of socio-economic position: Occupational social class, Education, Carstairs deprivation score (2001) were used. Simple (absolute/relative differences) and complex measures (Slope Index, Relative Index, Concentration Index and c-index) of inequality were produced for each age group across all four surveys. Results Simple and complex (absolute) measures of inequality have both demonstrated narrowing disparities in edentulism over time in the 45- to 64-year-old group, a levelling off in those aged 65 and above, and a rise in those aged 75+. Complex relative measures (RII, Concentration Index and c-index), however, show an increasing trend in inequalities over time for all age groups, suggesting that rates of improvement in edentulism rates are not uniform across all social groups. Conclusions Simple absolute inequality provides a quick and easy indication of the extent of disparities between extreme groups, whereas complex measures (absolute and relative) consider the gradient in health across all social groups. We have demonstrated that both are useful measures of inequality and should be considered complementary to one another. The appropriate choice of complex measure of inequality will depend on the audience to whom the results are to be communicated. This methodological approach is not confined to oral health but is applicable to other health outcomes that are socially patterned.
机译:目的利用一系列大型,代表性人口调查的数据,调查与苏格兰成人口腔健康相关的各种社会经济不平等衡量标准的适用性。方法苏格兰健康调查(SHeS)(1995年; 1998年; 2003年; 2008/09年)是横断面全国基于人口的调查,用于监测私人家庭的健康状况。这项研究包括的年龄组如下:45-54岁; 55-64岁:所有调查年份; 65-74:1998年起; 75岁以上:2003年以后。主要结果是没有自然的牙齿(牙科)。使用了三种社会经济地位衡量指标:职业社会阶层,教育程度,Carstairs剥夺分数(2001)。在所有四项调查中,每个年龄组均产生了不平等的简单(绝对/相对差异)和复杂度量(坡度指数,相对指数,浓度指数和c指数)。结果简单和复杂(绝对)的不平等程度都表明,随着年龄的增长,45岁至64岁年龄组的儿童牙列病差距逐渐缩小,65岁及以上年龄组的人数趋于稳定,而75岁以上年龄组的人数则呈上升趋势。然而,复杂的相对测量(RII,集中指数和c指数)显示,所有年龄段的不平等现象都随着时间的推移而增加,这表明在所有社会群体中,无牙颌率的提高率并不一致。结论简单的绝对不平等现象可以快速,轻松地表明极端群体之间的差异程度,而复杂的衡量指标(绝对和相对)则考虑了所有社会群体健康状况的梯度。我们已经证明,这两种方法都是衡量不平等程度的有用方法,应被视为相辅相成。复杂的不平等程度的适当选择取决于将结果传达给的受众。这种方法论方法不仅限于口腔健康,还适用于其他具有社会模式的健康结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号