首页> 外文期刊>Computational statistics & data analysis >A review of two different approaches for the analysis of growth data using longitudinal mixed linear models: Comparing hierarchical linear regression (ML3, HLM) and repeated measures designs with structured covariance matrices (BMDP5V)
【24h】

A review of two different approaches for the analysis of growth data using longitudinal mixed linear models: Comparing hierarchical linear regression (ML3, HLM) and repeated measures designs with structured covariance matrices (BMDP5V)

机译:使用纵向混合线性模型分析生长数据的两种不同方法的综述:比较分层线性回归(ML3,HLM)和具有结构化协方差矩阵(BMDP5V)的重复测量设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper we review two approaches for the analysis of growth data by means of longitudinal mixed linear models. In these models the individual growth parameters, (most often) specifying polynomial growth curves, may vary randomly across individuals. This variation may in turn be accounted for by explaining variables. The first approach we discuss, is a type of multilevel model in which growth data are treated as having a hierarchical structure: measurements are ‘nested’ within individuals. The second is a version of a MANOVA repeated measures model employing a structured (error)covariance matrix. Of both approaches we examine the underlying statistical models and their interrelations. Apart from this theoretical comparison we review software by which they can be applied for real data analysis: two multilevel programs, ML3 and HLM, and one repeated measures program, BMDP5V. The programs are described and discussed with respect to several more general criteria, such as data setup and handling, implemented numerical routines and user friendliness, and, in particular, with respect to their application in longitudinal situations, i.e. their capabilities for the analysis of data on growth. Two data sets are used to compare the results of analyses performed by the three programs. Although both ways of specifying growth curve models show some shortcomings, each appears to be a fruitful method to handle growth data, theoretically, as well as in a practical sense. For the most part, shortcomings are induced by the accompanying software, developed within different scientific traditions. Applied to comparable problems, the three programs produce equivalent results.
机译:在本文中,我们回顾了通过纵向混合线性模型分析增长数据的两种方法。在这些模型中,(通常)指定多项式增长曲线的个体增长参数可能会在个体之间随机变化。反过来,可以通过解释变量来解释这种变化。我们讨论的第一种方法是一种多层次模型,其中增长数据被视为具有层次结构:度量“嵌套”在个人内部。第二个是采用结构化(误差)协方差矩阵的MANOVA重复测量模型的版本。在这两种方法中,我们研究了基本的统计模型及其相互关系。除了这种理论上的比较之外,我们还将介绍可将其用于实际数据分析的软件:两个多层程序ML3和HLM,以及一个重复测量程序BMDP5V。关于程序的描述和讨论是针对一些更通用的标准,例如数据设置和处理,已实现的数字例程和用户友好性,尤其是针对它们在纵向情况下的应用,即它们用于数据分析的能力增长。使用两个数据集来比较这三个程序执行的分析结果。尽管两种指定增长曲线模型的方法都显示出一些缺点,但每种方法似乎都是处理增长数据的有效方法,无论是从理论上还是从实践意义上来讲。在大多数情况下,缺点是由在不同科学传统中开发的随附软件引起的。应用于可比较的问题,这三个程序会产生相同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号