...
首页> 外文期刊>Comprehensive psychiatry. >Clinical differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression as defined by the CORE system
【24h】

Clinical differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression as defined by the CORE system

机译:由CORE系统定义的忧郁症和非忧郁症抑郁症的临床差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The definition and delineation of melancholia have remained elusive for an extended period. A longstanding signal of psychomotor disturbance has been operationalized via the observer-rated CORE measure and with CORE-assigned melancholic and nonmelancholic compared in several Australian studies. Replication studies in other regions have not previously been reported. This study compares Brazilian patients with melancholic and nonmelancholic depression according to the CORE measure of psychomotor disturbance in terms of clinical characteristics, suicide ideation, stressful life events, quality of life, parental care, and personality styles. Methods: A total of 181 patients with unipolar major depression attending a tertiary care outpatient service in Brazil were evaluated in relation to melancholic status and study variables. Results: The CORE-assigned melancholic patients presented higher symptom severity, greater prevalence of suicide ideation, and Axis I comorbidities than nonmelancholics. Scores of dysfunctional personality styles and dysfunctional parental care measures were also higher among melancholics. Quality-of-life scores were low in both groups. Limitations: The absence of a criterion standard for the diagnosis of melancholia and the use of medication can be potential limitations of the study. Conclusion: Differences suggest that CORE-assigned melancholia defines a distinct group of patients and probably a disorder distinct from nonmelancholic depression not only in quantitative but also in qualitative aspects.
机译:背景:忧郁症的定义和描述在很长一段时间内一直难以捉摸。一项长期的精神运动障碍信号已通过观察者评级的CORE措施进行了操作,并在澳大利亚的一些研究中与CORE分配的忧郁和非忧郁症进行了比较。以前没有在其他地区进行复制研究的报道。这项研究根据心理运动障碍的CORE量度对巴西患有忧郁症和非忧郁症抑郁症的患者进行了临床特征,自杀观念,压力性生活事件,生活质量,父母关怀和人格风格的比较。方法:对巴西总共181例接受三级门诊就诊的单相重度抑郁症患者的忧郁状况和研究变量进行了评估。结果:与非忧郁症患者相比,由CORE指派的忧郁症患者表现出更高的症状严重度,自杀意念的发生率以及I轴合并症。忧郁症患者的人格功能障碍和父母护理措施障碍的得分也较高。两组的生活质量得分均较低。局限性:缺乏用于诊断忧郁症的标准标准和药物的使用可能是该研究的潜在局限性。结论:差异表明,CORE分配的忧郁症定义了一组不同的患者,并且可能是一种与非忧郁症抑郁症不同的疾病,不仅在数量上而且在定性方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号