...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinica chimica acta: International journal of clinical chemistry and applied molecular biology >Revaluation of biological variation of glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) using an accurately designed protocol and an assay traceable to the IFCC reference system.
【24h】

Revaluation of biological variation of glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) using an accurately designed protocol and an assay traceable to the IFCC reference system.

机译:使用精确设计的方案和可追溯到IFCC参考系统的测定方法,重新评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))的生物学变异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) has a key role for diagnosing diabetes and monitoring glycemic state. As recently reviewed, available data on HbA(1c) biological variation show marked heterogeneity. Here we experimentally revaluated these data using a well designed protocol. METHODS: We took five EDTA whole blood specimens from 18 apparently healthy subjects on the same day, every two weeks for two months. Samples were stored at -80 degrees C until analysis and assayed in duplicate in a single run by Roche Tina-quant(R) Gen.2 immunoassay. Data were analyzed by the ANOVA. To assess the assay traceability to the IFCC reference method, we preliminarily carried out a correlation experiment. RESULTS: The bias (mean+/-SD) of the Roche immunoassay was 0.3%+/-0.7%, confirming the traceability of the employed assay. No difference was found in HbA(1c) values between men and women. Within- and between-subject CV were 2.5% and 7.1%, respectively. Derived desirable analytical goals for imprecision, bias, and total error resulted 1.3%, 1.9%, and 3.9%, respectively. HbA(1c) had marked individuality, limiting the use of population-based reference limits for test interpretation. The estimated critical difference was ~10%. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time we defined biological variation and derived indices for the clinical application of HbA(1c) measurements using an accurately designed protocol and an assay standardized according to the IFCC.
机译:背景:糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))在诊断糖尿病和监测血糖状态中具有关键作用。正如最近所评论的,有关HbA(1c)生物学变异的可用数据显示出明显的异质性。在这里,我们使用精心设计的协议对这些数据进行了实验性的重新评估。方法:我们在同一天,每两周一次,共两个月,从18位貌似健康的受试者中采集了五个EDTA全血标本。将样品存储在-80℃直到分析为止,并通过Roche Tina-quant Gen 2免疫测定法一式两份进行测定。通过ANOVA分析数据。为了评估该方法对IFCC参考方法的可追溯性,我们初步进行了相关实验。结果:罗氏免疫测定的偏差(平均值±标准偏差)为0.3%±0.7%,证实了所用测定的可追溯性。男女之间的HbA(1c)值无差异。受试者内部和受试者之间的简历分别为2.5%和7.1%。得出的不精确度,偏差和总误差的理想分析目标分别为1.3%,1.9%和3.9%。 HbA(1c)具有明显的个性,限制了基于人群的参考限用于测试解释。估计的临界差约为10%。结论:我们首次使用精确设计的方案和根据IFCC标准化的测定方法,为HbA(1c)测量的临床应用定义了生物学变异和派生指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号