...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental rheumatology >Comparison of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with a multi-sensor armband accelerometer in women with fibromyalgia: the al-Andalus project
【24h】

Comparison of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with a multi-sensor armband accelerometer in women with fibromyalgia: the al-Andalus project

机译:国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)与多传感器臂带加速度计在纤维肌痛患者中的比较:al-Andalus项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To compare levels of physical activity (PA) assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with PA measured with the SenseWear Pro Armband (SWA) in women with fibromyalgia, and to assess the test-retest reliability of the IPAQ. Methods. The study comprised a total of 183 women with fibromyalgia aged 51.1 ±8.2 years. Participants wore the SWA for 9 consecutive days and filled in the IPAQ twice (separated by a 9-day interval). Total PA, time spent on moderate and vigorous intensity PA, and sitting time assessed by the IPAQ and the SWA (n=123) were compared. Results. Time spent on PA at different intensities (total, moderate and vigorous) was higher and sedentary time was lower when assessed by the IPAQ compared with the SWA (all p<0.001). Differences between the IPAQ and the SWA increased as the minutes per day in the IPAQ increased. The Bland-Altrnan plots showed no agreement between the IPAQ and the SWA. There was no association between the IPAQ and the SWA in any of the variables studied, except for walking domain from the IPAQ and moderate PA from the SWA (r_p=0.19,p=0.03). Test-retest systematic differences were found for total PA score, moderate and vigorous intensity, working and domestic domains (all p<0.05). The ICCs for those domains without systematic differences (sitting, vehicle, walking, active transport time and leisure domains) ranged from 0.52 to 0.71). Conclusions. The IPAQ differs from objectively measured PA and presents limitations to classify different categories of PA based on SWA data. Moreover, the IPAQ is not a reliable tool to assess PA in women with fibromyalgia.
机译:目的。比较国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)评估的运动水平(PA)和纤维肌痛妇女使用SenseWear Pro Armband(SWA)测量的PA,并评估IPAQ的重测可靠性。方法。该研究共纳入183名51.1±8.2岁的纤维肌痛妇女。参与者连续9天穿着SWA,并两次填写了IPAQ(以9天为间隔)。比较了总PA,花费在中等强度和剧烈强度PA上的时间以及IPAQ和SWA评估的就坐时间(n = 123)。结果。通过IPAQ评估,在不同强度(总强度,中等强度和剧烈强度)下花费在PA上的时间更长,而久坐时间则比SWA少(所有p <0.001)。 IPAQ和SWA之间的差异随着IPAQ中每天的分钟数增加而增加。 Bland-Altrnan地块表明IPAQ和SWA之间没有达成一致。除了所研究的IPAQ的步行域和SWA的中度PA(r_p = 0.19,p = 0.03),IPAQ和SWA之间没有任何关联。在总PA评分,中度和剧烈强度,工作和家庭领域中发现了测试-再测试的系统差异(所有p <0.05)。那些没有系统差异(坐,车,走,活动运输时间和休闲区域)的区域的ICC范围为0.52至0.71)。结论IPAQ与客观测量的PA不同,并提出了基于SWA数据对PA的不同类别进行分类的限制。此外,IPAQ并不是评估纤维肌痛女性PA的可靠工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号