...
首页> 外文期刊>Community Ecology >Sensitivity of ground layer vegetation diversity descriptors in indicating forest naturalness
【24h】

Sensitivity of ground layer vegetation diversity descriptors in indicating forest naturalness

机译:指示森林自然性的地表植被多样性描述子的敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different diversity measures of forest floor assemblages were evaluated in order to check if they can be used as indicators of forest naturalness. We compared vascular and bryophyte vegetation of two habitat types in an unman-aged beech-dominated reserve and five managed stands of different ages. We used systematically collected data characterizing four spatial scales obtained by successively aggregating neighbouring quadrats. Species richness did not always differentiate near natural sites from managed sites, and the observed difference depended very much on the spatial scale used. The behaviour of Shannon-Wiener diversity function can only be understood if both the species richness and the evenness components are considered. Near natural plots hadhigh Shannon-Wiener diversity values even at the finest spatial scale not only because of high number of species, but also because of high evenness. We found that a simple measure of pattern diversity - spatial variation of species importance - was themost effective in differentiating the diversity of plots with different levels of naturalness. The absolute values of pattern diversity in the forest floor vegetation were the highest in those plots where the characteristics of important limiting ecological factors were generated by natural disturbance. Vascular and bryophyte species responded differently to tree stand structural characteristics. The diversity of vascular vegetation was determined mainly by the spatial variation of light availability, whereas that of bryophyte vegetation responded to the amount and spatial heterogeneity of appropriate substrates (dead wood, rock). The use of pattern sensitive diversity measures is necessary to reveal diversity-naturalness relationships. We suggest that all diversity descriptors should be calculated for different spatial scales, since their change with spatial scale was as informative as their actual values.
机译:为了评估是否可以将其用作森林自然度指标,对林底组合的不同多样性进行了评估。我们在一个无人管理的山毛榉为主的保护区和五个不同年龄的管理林分中比较了两种生境类型的维管植物和苔藓植物。我们使用系统收集的数据来表征通过连续聚集相邻四边形获得的四个空间尺度。物种丰富度并不总是能将自然地点与受管理地点区分开来,而且观察到的差异在很大程度上取决于所使用的空间尺度。只有同时考虑物种丰富度和均匀度成分,才能理解香农-维纳分集函数的行为。即使在最佳的空间尺度上,近乎自然的样地也具有较高的香农-维纳多样性值,这不仅是由于物种数量众多,而且还因为其均匀度很高。我们发现,一种简单的模式多样性测量方法-物种重要性的空间变化-在区分自然程度不同的样地多样性方面最有效。在那些由于自然干扰而产生重要限制生态因子特征的土地上,森林地表植被格局多样性的绝对值最高。血管和苔藓植物对林分结构特征的反应不同。维管植物的多样性主要由光的空间分布决定,而苔藓植物的多样性则对适当基质(枯木,岩石)的数量和空间异质性作出响应。必须使用模式敏感的多样性度量来揭示多样性与自然的关系。我们建议应针对不同的空间尺度计算所有多样性描述符,因为它们随空间尺度的变化与实际值一样具有信息意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号