...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental nephrology >Effects of three kinds of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on renal anemia in Japanese non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients
【24h】

Effects of three kinds of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on renal anemia in Japanese non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients

机译:三种促红细胞生成剂对日本非透析慢性肾脏病患者肾性贫血的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are standard therapy for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with renal anemia. However, few studies have compared the effects of different ESAs on anemia in identical pre-dialysis CKD patients. Methods Seventy-nine patients who switched from epoetin beta to darbepoetin alfa (Group 1), and 82 patients who switched from darbepoetin alfa to epoetin beta pegol (Group 2) were enrolled in this study. Clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed for 6 months before and after switching ESAs. The prevalence of adverse events, the dose conversion ratio of ESAs, and the frequency of ESA administration were also analyzed. Results Analysis of variance showed that switching ESAs did not significantly change hemoglobin levels for the study duration in both groups (mean hemoglobin 10.3-10.5 g/dL in Group 1 and 10.4-10.7 g/dL in Group 2). Estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood pressure, transferrin saturation, ferritin, and albumin remained constant in both groups. The prevalence of adverse effects was quite low (0-3.8 %) during both 6-month study periods. The mean dose conversion ratio for epoetin beta: darbepoetin alfa was 163.7 units: 1 mug and for darbepoetinalfa:epoetin beta pegol was 1.08 mug:l ug. The intervals of ESA administration significantly differed (epoetin beta pegol > darbepoetin alfa > epoetin beta). Conclusions Epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, and epoetin beta pegol are effective and well-tolerated agents for managing anemia in Japanese pre-dialysis CKD patients. The intervals of ESA administration to maintain a patient's target hemoglobin were longer in the order of epoetin beta pegol > darbepoetin alfa > epoetin beta.
机译:背景促红细胞生成素(ESA)是慢性肾病(CKD)肾性贫血患者的标准疗法。但是,很少有研究比较相同的透析前CKD患者中不同ESA对贫血的影响。方法本研究招募了79例从epoetinβ转变为darbepoetin alfa的患者(第1组)和82例从darbepoetin al转变为epoetinβpegol的患者(第2组)。在切换ESA之前和之后的6个月中评估了临床和实验室参数。还分析了不良事件的发生率,ESA的剂量转化率以及ESA的给药频率。结果方差分析表明,两组的研究期间切换ESA均不会显着改变血红蛋白水平(第1组的平均血红蛋白为10.3-10.5 g / dL,第2组的平均血红蛋白为10.4-10.7 g / dL)。两组的估计肾小球滤过率,血压,转铁蛋白饱和度,铁蛋白和白蛋白均保持恒定。在两个月的两个研究期内,不良反应的发生率非常低(0-3.8%)。依泊汀β:darbepoetin alfa的平均剂量转化率为163.7单位:1杯,而依泊汀inalfa:epoetinβ聚乙二醇的平均剂量转化率为1.08杯:1 ug。 ESA的给药间隔显着不同(epoetinβ聚乙二醇> darbepoetin alfa> epoetinβ)。结论Epoetin beta,darbepoetin alfa和epoetin beta pegol是治疗日本透析前CKD患者贫血的有效且耐受性良好的药物。维持患者目标血红蛋白的ESA给药间隔按epoetin beta聚乙二醇> darbepoetin alfa> epoetin beta的顺序较长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号