...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer.
【24h】

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

机译:胸腔食管癌明确放化疗后进行挽救食管切除术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although locoregional failure frequently occurs after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the role of salvage esophagectomy has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of salvage esophagectomy after high-dose definitive CRT with neoadjuvant CRT. METHODS: From 1994 to 2007, 33 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT, and 115 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery. RESULTS: The postoperative mortality rate in the salvage group (12%) was higher than in the neoadjuvant group (3.6%, P = 0.059). The rates of postoperative complications were significantly higher in the salvage group than in neoadjuvant group: Anastomotic leakage (39% vs. 22%, respectively, P = 0.049), bleeding (15% vs. 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.002), cardiovascular complications (24% vs. 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that pretherapy T stage, pretherapy lymph node status, pathological T stage, and operative curability were significant prognostic factors affecting survival of patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy. In particular, patients with cT3-T4 tumors or cN1 tumors before definitive CRT showed worse prognosis after salvage esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose definitive CRT was associated with higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates compared with neoadjuvant CRT. Only selected patients can be rescued by salvage esophagectomy.
机译:背景与目的:尽管局部放疗在定型放化疗后经常发生,但尚未完全评估抢救性食管切除术的作用。这项研究的目的是比较大剂量确定性CRT与新辅助CRT后的挽救食管切除术的结果。方法:1994年至2007年,对33例胸段食管癌患者行了明确的CRT手术后进行了挽救性食管切除术,其中115例患者接受了新辅助CRT手术。结果:挽救组的术后死亡率(12%)高于新辅助组(3.6%,P = 0.059)。抢救组的术后并发症发生率明显高于新辅助组:吻合口漏(分别为39%和22%,P = 0.049),出血(分别为15%和1.7%,P = 0.002),心血管并发症(分别为24%和5.4%,P = 0.001)。单因素分析表明,术前T期,术前淋巴结状态,病理T期和手术可治愈性是影响接受挽救食管切除术患者生存的重要预后因素。尤其是,在确定性CRT之前患有cT3-T4肿瘤或cN1肿瘤的患者在挽救食管切除术后显示出较差的预后。结论:与新辅助CRT相比,大剂量确定性CRT后挽救食管切除术与较高的术后死亡率和发病率相关。挽救食管切除术只能挽救部分患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号