首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews >Both autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell and peripheral blood progenitor cell therapies similarly improve ischaemia in patients with diabetic foot in comparison with control treatment
【24h】

Both autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell and peripheral blood progenitor cell therapies similarly improve ischaemia in patients with diabetic foot in comparison with control treatment

机译:与对照治疗相比,自体骨髓单个核细胞治疗和外周血祖细胞治疗均能改善糖尿病足患者的局部缺血

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of our study was to compare the effect of bone marrow mononuclear cell and peripheral blood progenitor cell therapies in patients with diabetic foot disease and critical limb ischaemia unresponsive to revascularization with conservative therapy. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with diabetic foot disease (17 treated by bone marrow cells and 11 by peripheral blood cell) were included into an active group and 22 patients into a control group without cell treatment. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure and rate of major amputation, as the main outcome measures, were compared between bone marrow cells, peripheral blood cell and control groups over 6months; both cell therapy methods were also compared by the characteristics of cell suspensions. Possible adverse events were evaluated by changes of serum levels of angiogenic cytokines and retinal fundoscopic examination. Results: The transcutaneous oxygen pressure increased significantly (p<0.05) compared with baseline in both active groups after 6months, with no significant differences between bone marrow cells and peripheral blood cell groups; however, no change of transcutaneous oxygen pressure in the control group was observed. The rate of major amputation by 6months was significantly lower in the active cell therapy group compared with that in the control group (11.1% vs. 50%, p=0.0032), with no difference between bone marrow cells and peripheral blood cell. A number of injected CD34+ cells and serum levels of angiogenic cytokines after treatment did not significantly differ between bone marrow cells and peripheral blood cell. Conclusions: Our study showed a superior benefit of bone marrow cells and peripheral blood cell treatments of critical limb ischaemia in patients with diabetic foot disease when compared with conservative therapy. There was no difference between both cell therapy groups, and no patient demonstrated signs of systemic vasculogenesis.
机译:背景:我们的研究目的是比较骨髓单核细胞疗法和外周血祖细胞疗法在糖尿病足病和危重肢体缺血对血运重建无反应的保守治疗中的效果。方法:将28例糖尿病足病患者(其中17例经骨髓细胞治疗,11例经外周血细胞治疗)纳入活动组,将22例未经细胞治疗的对照组纳入研究。比较了六个月以上的骨髓细胞,外周血细胞和对照组的经皮氧压和主要截肢率,作为主要结果指标。还通过细胞悬浮液的特征比较了两种细胞治疗方法。通过血清血管生成细胞因子水平的变化和视网膜眼底镜检查来评估可能的不良事件。结果:六个月后,两个活动组的经皮氧气压力均较基线显着增加(p <0.05),骨髓细胞与外周血细胞组之间无显着差异。然而,对照组中未观察到经皮氧气压力的变化。活性细胞治疗组的6个月大截肢率明显低于对照组(分别为11.1%和50%,p = 0.0032),骨髓细胞和外周血细胞之间无差异。骨髓细胞和外周血细胞之间治疗后的许多注入的CD34 +细胞和血管生成细胞因子的血清水平没有显着差异。结论:我们的研究表明,与保守治疗相比,糖尿病足病患者的骨髓细胞和外周血细胞治疗危重肢体缺血的优势更大。两个细胞治疗组之间没有差异,也没有患者表现出全身性血管生成的迹象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号