首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >A crossover comparison of glycemic variations in japanese patients with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine versus insulin detemir twice daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): J COLLECTION (Jikei COmparison of Lantus and LEvemir with Cgm for Thinking Insulin OptimizatioN)
【24h】

A crossover comparison of glycemic variations in japanese patients with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine versus insulin detemir twice daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): J COLLECTION (Jikei COmparison of Lantus and LEvemir with Cgm for Thinking Insulin OptimizatioN)

机译:使用连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)每天两次接受甘精胰岛素与地特米尔胰岛素的日本1型糖尿病患者血糖变化的交叉比较:J COLLECTION(Lantus和Levemir的Jikei COmparison与Cgm进行胰岛素优化思考)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: This study aimed to compare glycemic variations seen among Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin glargine versus insulin detemir using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a crossover design. Subjects and Methods: Twenty-three patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled in this study. The subjects were on either insulin glargine followed by insulin detemir twice daily, or vice versa, with no change in the timing of injections. The glycemic variations during 4-day hospitalizations were monitored by CGM while the patients were on either regimen, with a second hospitalization scheduled more than 1 month after the change of the long-acting insulin analogs. CGM data obtained on Day 3 of both hospitalizations were compared. Results: The subjects had a median age of 44.0 years, a median body mass index of 22.2 kg/m 2, and a median glycosylated hemoglobin of 7.3%. There was no significant difference between the two treatments with a mean glucose level of 156 mg/dL with the insulin glargine treatment versus 150 mg/dL with the insulin detemir treatment; their SD values were 60 versus 51 mg/dL, their mean amplitude of glycemic excursions values were 121 versus 105 mg/dL, and their mean of daily differences values were 45.7 versus 41.4 mg/dL, respectively. In addition, the insulin detemir treatment was associated with a narrower range of postprandial glucose increases after lunch (80 vs. 59 mg/dL; P=0.007). Conclusions: A comparison of the long-acting insulin analogs administered twice daily in type 1 diabetes demonstrated that insulin detemir may potentially offer better glycemic control after lunch than insulin glargine.
机译:背景:本研究旨在通过交叉设计中使用连续葡萄糖监测(CGM),比较在接受甘精胰岛素与地特米尔胰岛素治疗的日本1型糖尿病患者中观察到的血糖变化。对象和方法:本研究招募了23例1型糖尿病患者。受试者接受甘精胰岛素注射,然后每天两次接受德特米尔胰岛素注射,反之亦然,注射时间无变化。当患者采用两种治疗方案时,通过CGM监测4天住院期间的血糖变化,并在更换长效胰岛素类似物后1个月以上安排第二次住院。比较了两次住院第3天获得的CGM数据。结果:受试者的中位年龄为44.0岁,中位体重指数为22.2 kg / m 2,中位糖基化血红蛋白为7.3%。甘精胰岛素治疗的平均血糖水平为156 mg / dL的两种治疗与胰岛素地特米尔治疗的150 mg / dL的两种治疗之间无显着差异。它们的SD值分别为60和51 mg / dL,平均血糖波动幅度为121和105 mg / dL,日均差分别为45.7和41.4 mg / dL。此外,胰岛素地特米尔治疗与午餐后餐后血糖升高的范围较窄有关(80 vs. 59 mg / dL; P = 0.007)。结论:在1型糖尿病中每天两次服用长效胰岛素类似物的比较表明,地特胰岛素在午餐后比甘精胰岛素可能提供更好的血糖控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号