首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics: The Journal of the International Association for Wind Engineering >Comparison of wind pressure measurements on tower-like structure obtained from full-scale observation, wind tunnel test, and the CFD technology
【24h】

Comparison of wind pressure measurements on tower-like structure obtained from full-scale observation, wind tunnel test, and the CFD technology

机译:通过全面观测,风洞测试和CFD技术获得的塔状结构上的风压测量结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Full-scale measurements, wind tunnel tests and CFD calculations have been carried out on pressure measurements on a tower-like structure. This paper presents the comparison of pressure measurements among these three methods. The mean wind pressure coefficients obtained from the wind tunnel tests are fairly close to those of the full-scale measurements after the reference pressure is taken into consideration. RMS wind pressure coefficients obtained in the wind tunnel tests were smaller than those in the full-scale measurements. In the application of the results of wind tunnel test to real designs, at least the turbulent intensity of approaching wind should be taken into consideration, at least. As regards mean wind pressure coefficients of the comparisons among the three methods, CFD calculated results showed good agreement with those of wind tunnel tests and full-scale.
机译:已经对塔状结构的压力测量进行了满量程测量,风洞测试和CFD计算。本文介绍了这三种方法中压力测量的比较。在考虑了参考压力之后,从风洞测试中获得的平均风压系数非常接近于满量程测量的平均风压系数。风洞测试中获得的RMS风压系数小于满量程测量中的RMS风压系数。在将风洞测试结果应用于实际设计时,至少应至少考虑接近风的湍流强度。关于这三种方法的比较的平均风压系数,CFD计算结果与风洞试验和全面测量结果显示出良好的一致性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号