...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Wildlife Management >Survival of white-tailed deer fawns in the grasslands of the Northern Great Plains.
【24h】

Survival of white-tailed deer fawns in the grasslands of the Northern Great Plains.

机译:白尾鹿在北部大平原的草原上生存。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Environmental factors, such as forest characteristics, have been linked to fawn survival in eastern and southern white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations. In the Great Plains, less is known about how intrinsic and habitat factors influence fawn survival. During 2007-2009, we captured and radiocollared 81 fawns in north-central South Dakota and recorded 23 mortalities, of which 18 died before 1 September. Predation accounted for 52.2% of mortality; remaining mortality included human (hunting, vehicle, and farm accident; 26.1%) and hypothermia (21.7%). Coyotes (Canis latrans) accounted for 83.3% of predation on fawns. We used known-fate analysis in Program MARK to estimate summer (15 May-31 Aug) survival rates and investigated the influence of intrinsic and habitat variables on survival. We developed 2 a priori model sets, including intrinsic variables and a test of annual variation in survival (model set 1) and habitat variables (model set 2). Model set 1 indicated that summer survival varied among years (2007-2009); annual survival rates were 0.94 (SE=0.06, n=22), 0.78 (SE=0.09, n=27), and 0.54 (SE=0.10, n=32), respectively. Model set 2 indicated that survival was further influenced by patch density of cover habitats (Conservation Reserve Program [CRP]-grasslands, forested cover, and wetlands). Mean CRP-grassland and wetland patch density (no. patches/100 ha) were greater (P<0.001) in home-range areas of surviving fawns (xCRPPD=1.81, SE=0.10, n=63; xWetPD=1.75, SE=0.14, n=63, respectively) than in home-range areas of fawns that died (xCRPPD=0.16, SE=0.04, n=18; xWetPD=1.28, SE=0.10, n=18, respectively). Mean forested cover patch density was less (P<0.001) in home-range areas of surviving fawns (xFCPD=0.77, SE=0.10, n=63) than in home-range areas of fawns that died (xFCPD=1.49, SE=0.21, n=18). Our results indicate that management activities should focus on CRP-grassland and wetland habitats in order to maintain or improve fawn survival in the northern Great Plains, rather than forested cover composed primarily of tree plantings and shelterbelts.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.339
机译:环境因素(例如森林特征)与东部和南部白尾鹿( Ococoileus virginianus )种群的小鹿生存有关。在大平原,关于内在因素和栖息地因素如何影响小鹿生存的知之甚少。在2007年至2009年期间,我们在南达科他州中北部捕获了81只小鹿并进行了无线电领捕,记录了23例死亡,其中18例在9月1日之前死亡。捕食占死亡率的52.2%;其余的死亡率包括人类(狩猎,车辆和农场事故; 26.1%)和体温过低(21.7%)。土狼( Canis latrans )占小鹿捕食的83.3%。我们使用MARK项目中的已知命运分析来估计夏季(5月15日至8月31日)的生存率,并研究了内在和栖息地变量对生存的影响。我们开发了2个先验模型集,包括固有变量以及生存率(模型集1)和栖息地变量(模型集2)的年度变化测试。模型集1表明,夏季生存期在不同年份(2007-2009年)不同;年生存率分别为0.94(SE = 0.06, n = 22),0.78(SE = 0.09, n = 27)和0.54(SE = 0.10, n = 32)。模型集2表明,生存率还受覆盖栖息地(保护区计划[CRP]-草地,森林覆盖和湿地)斑块密度的影响。在存活的小鹿的家乡区域( x )的平均CRP草地和湿地斑块密度(没有斑块/ 100公顷)更大( P <0.001) CRPPD = 1.81,SE = 0.10, n = 63; x WetPD = 1.75,SE = 0.14, n = 63)比死去的小鹿的家园区域( x CRPPD = 0.16,SE = 0.04, n = 18; x WetPD = 1.28,SE = 0.10, n = 18)。在幸存的小鹿的家乡范围内,平均森林覆盖斑块密度较小( P <0.001)( x FCPD = 0.77,SE = 0.10 , n = 63)比死亡的小鹿的家属区域( x FCPD = 1.49,SE = 0.21, n = 18)。我们的结果表明,管理活动应集中在CRP草地和湿地生境上,以维持或改善大平原北部的小鹿生存,而不是主要由树木和防护林组成的林木覆盖物。 doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.339

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号