...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thermodynamics >Historical Prospective: Boltzmann's versus Planck's State Counting - Why Boltzmann Did Not Arrive at Planck's Distribution Law
【24h】

Historical Prospective: Boltzmann's versus Planck's State Counting - Why Boltzmann Did Not Arrive at Planck's Distribution Law

机译:历史观点:玻尔兹曼与普朗克的国家计数-玻尔兹曼为何未达到普朗克的分配定律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Why does Planck (1900), referring to Boltzmann's 1877 probabilistic treatment, obtain his quantum distribution function while Boltzmann did not? To answer this question, both treatments are compared on the basis of Boltzmann's 1868 three-level scheme (configuration - occupation - occupancy). Some calculations by Planck (1900, 1901, and 1913) and Einstein (1907) are also sketched. For obtaining a quantum distribution, it is crucial to stick with a discrete energy spectrum and to make the limit transitions to infinity at the right place. For correct state counting, the concept of interchangeability of particles is superior to that of indistinguishability.
机译:为什么普朗克(1900)参考玻尔兹曼(Boltzmann)1877年的概率处理方法却获得了量子分布函数而玻尔兹曼(Boltzmann)没有呢?为了回答这个问题,在玻尔兹曼(Boltzmann)1868年的三级方案(配置-占用-占用)的基础上比较了两种处理方式。还概述了普朗克(1900、1901和1913)和爱因斯坦(1907)的一些计算。为了获得量子分布,至关重要的是要坚持使用离散的能谱并在正确的位置使极限跃迁到无穷大。对于正确的状态计数,粒子的可互换性概念优于不可区分的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号