首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Virological Methods >Comparison of two commercial molecular assays for simultaneous detection of respiratory viruses in clinical samples using two automatic electrophoresis detection systems
【24h】

Comparison of two commercial molecular assays for simultaneous detection of respiratory viruses in clinical samples using two automatic electrophoresis detection systems

机译:使用两种自动电泳检测系统同时检测临床样本中呼吸道病毒的两种商业分子检测方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two molecular assays were compared with real-time RT-PCR and viral culture for simultaneous detection of common viruses from respiratory samples: a multiplex ligation-dependant probe amplification (MLPA) and a dual priming oligonucleotide system (DPO). In addition, the positive detections of MLPA and DPO were identified using two different automatic electrophoresis systems. A panel of 168 culture-positive and negative samples was tested by the molecular assays for the presence of influenza A and B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, coronaviruses, parainfluenza viruses and adenovirus.One hundred and twenty-nine (77%) samples were positive as detected by at least one method. Sixty-nine (41%) samples were positive by cell culture (excluding human metapneumovirus and coronaviruses), 116(69%) by RT-PCR, 127(76%) by MLPA and 100(60%) by DPO. The MLPA yielded results in one attempt for all samples included while 12 (7.2%) samples had to be repeated by the DPO assay due to inconclusive results. The MLPA assay performed well in combination with either electrophoresis system, while the performance of the DPO assay was influenced by the electrophoresis systems.Both molecular assays are comparable with real-time RT-PCR, more sensitive than viral culture and can detect dual infections easily. Results can be obtained within 1 day
机译:为了实时检测呼吸道样本中的常见病毒,将两种分子检测与实时RT-PCR和病毒培养进行了比较:多重连接依赖探针扩增(MLPA)和双引物寡核苷酸系统(DPO)。此外,使用两种不同的自动电泳系统鉴定了MLPA和DPO的阳性检测结果。通过分子分析检测了168个培养阳性和阴性样品,以检测是否存在甲型和乙型流感病毒,呼吸道合胞病毒,人间质肺病毒,鼻病毒,冠状病毒,副流感病毒和腺病毒.129(77至少一种方法检测到的样品为阳性)。通过细胞培养(不包括人间质肺病毒和冠状病毒),六十九(41%)个样本为阳性,RT-PCR为116(69%),MLPA为127(76%),DPO为100(60%)。 MLPA一次尝试对所有样品产生了结果,而由于不确定的结果,必须通过DPO分析重复12次(7.2%)样品。 MLPA分析法与任何一种电泳系统结合使用均表现良好,而DPO分析法的性能受电泳系统的影响。两种分子分析法均与实时RT-PCR相当,比病毒培养法灵敏,可以轻松检测双重感染。可以在1天内获得结果

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号