...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Virological Methods >Assessment of selective real-time PCR for quantitation of lamivudine and adefovir hepatitis B virus-resistant strains and comparison with direct sequencing and line probe assays
【24h】

Assessment of selective real-time PCR for quantitation of lamivudine and adefovir hepatitis B virus-resistant strains and comparison with direct sequencing and line probe assays

机译:评估选择性实时PCR定量拉米夫定和阿德福韦乙型肝炎病毒耐药株,并与直接测序和线探针测定法进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A selective real-time PCR (sPCR) assay has been developed to detect the rtM204V/I and rtN236T mutations of hepatitis B virus (HBV) associated with resistance to lamivudine and adefovir. Using mixtures of mutant and wild-type plasmids, this sPCR was able to detect 0.1% of mutated strain in a total plasmid population of 10(5) copies and was more sensitive in detecting resistant strains than the line probe INNO-LiPA-DR-v2 assay and a direct sequencing assay. The comparison of these methods on 20 clinical specimens from treated patients confirmed the plasmid results: the three methods were concordant for the detection of the mutant strains in 72% of the cases and the discrepant results were caused mainly by the sequencing assay's lack of sensitivity. The line probe assay was more sensitive for detecting mutations than sPCR when the viral load was less than 10(4) copies/ml; conversely, the sPCR provided a more sensitive detection when the viral load was greater than 10(4) copies/ml. Although difficult to perform in clinical practice, sPCR appears to be a reliable technique for detecting and quantifying quasi-species resistant to lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir (ADV) and can be useful to gain a better understanding of the natural history of antiviral resistance during the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
机译:已开发出一种选择性实时PCR(sPCR)分析方法,以检测与对拉米夫定和阿德福韦耐药相关的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)rtM204V / I和rtN236T突变。使用突变型和野生型质粒的混合物,此sPCR能够检测到10(5)个拷贝的总质粒群体中0.1%的突变菌株,并且比线性探针INNO-LiPA-DR-更敏感地检测耐药菌株v2分析和直接测序分析。将这些方法与来自治疗患者的20个临床标本进行的比较证实了质粒的结果:这三种方法在72%的病例中一致地检测出突变菌株,而结果的差异主要是由于测序分析的敏感性不足。当病毒载量小于10(4)拷贝/ ml时,线探针测定法比sPCR更为敏感。相反,当病毒载量大于10(4)拷贝/ ml时,sPCR提供了更灵敏的检测。尽管在临床实践中难以执行,但sPCR似乎是检测和定量对拉米夫定(LAM)和阿德福韦(ADV)耐药的准物种的可靠技术,可有助于更好地了解抗拉米夫定耐药史。慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号