...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Predictive factors of success following radio-frequency stylet (RFS) ablation of incompetent perforating veins (IPV).
【24h】

Predictive factors of success following radio-frequency stylet (RFS) ablation of incompetent perforating veins (IPV).

机译:射频通气管(RFS)切除功能不全的穿刺静脉(IPV)后成功的预测因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential predictive factors associated with success or failure of incompetent perforating veins (IPVs) treated with radio-frequency stylet (RFS). METHODS: Over the last 12 months in this observational study, 38 consecutive patients with various degrees of venous insufficiency and IPVs underwent 48 office-based radio-frequency ablation procedures (1 - C 3; 7 - C 4; 10 - C 5; 30 - C 6) in 44 limbs. There were 21 females and 17 males with a mean age of 67 +/- 17 years (38-93 years) who had a total of 93 IPVs (40 calf; 53 ankle). Eighteen patients (47%) had ipsilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) radio-frequency closures performed prior to current procedure. The venous flow pattern was classified by spectral waveform analysis as "normal" (spontaneous with respiratory phasicity) in 33 patients and "pulsatile" (with bidirectional cardiac phasicity) in five patients. Follow-up duplex scans were performed from 3 to 7 days postprocedure. Statistical analyses were performed for determining correlation between the various factors such as, age, pulsatile flow, CEAP class, prior GSV ablation, vein diameter, reflux, and patency. RESULTS: The mean number of ablated IPVs was 1.94 +/- 0.38 ranging from 1-3. Immediate success rate was 88% (82 cases, 32 patients). IPVs had a duplex measured mean diameter of 3.8 +/- 1.1 mm (2-6.6 mm). Eleven IPVs remained patent in six patients. There was no significant difference between the patent and the obliterated IPV groups concerning age (P = 0.75), prior GSV ablation (P = .19), IPV diameter (P = .08) and CEAP classification. Conversely, four of the five procedures (80%) performed in patients with "pulsatile" venous flow failed, while only two of the remaining 43 procedures (4.7%) in patients with "normal" venous flow failed (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These data show that a pulsatile venous flow pattern is a significant predictor of failure following RFS for IPVs.
机译:目的:评估与射频探针(RFS)治疗的无能力穿孔静脉(IPV)成败相关的潜在预测因素。方法:在该观察性研究的过去12个月中,连续38例患有各种程度的静脉功能不全和IPV的患者接受了48例基于办公室的射频消融手术(1-C 3; 7-C 4; 10-C 5; 30 -C 6)44条肢体。有21名女性和17名男性,平均年龄为67 +/- 17岁(38-93岁),共有93例IPV(40头小腿; 53例脚踝)。在当前手术之前,有18例患者(47%)进行了同侧大隐静脉(GSV)射频封闭。通过频谱波形分析将静脉血流类型分为33例患者为“正常”(自然呼吸频率)和5例患者为“搏动性”(双向心脏呼吸频率)。术后3到7天进行了后续双工扫描。进行统计分析以确定各种因素之间的相关性,例如年龄,脉动血流,CEAP类别,先前的GSV消融,静脉直径,反流和通畅。结果:切除的IPV的平均数量为1.94 +/- 0.38,范围为1-3。立即成功率为88%(82例,32例)。 IPV的双相测量平均直径为3.8 +/- 1.1毫米(2-6.6毫米)。 11例IPV在6例患者中仍获得专利。专利与闭塞的IPV组之间在年龄(P = 0.75),以前的GSV消融(P = .19),IPV直径(P = .08)和CEAP分类方面没有显着差异。相反,在“搏动性”静脉血流患者中执行的五种手术中有四项(80%)失败,而在“正常”静脉血流患者中的其余43种手术中只有两项(4.7%)失败(P <.001)。结论:这些数据表明搏动性静脉血流模式是IPV射频消融后失败的重要预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号