首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass using saphenous vein graft.
【24h】

Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass using saphenous vein graft.

机译:使用大隐静脉移植术进行内窥镜与开放性大隐静脉的收集,以进行股骨至膝以下动脉旁路手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although the use of endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) in coronary artery bypass grafting is accepted, few studies have documented the implementation of EVH in peripheral vascular disease surgery. We hypothesized that EVH improves outcomes compared with open vein harvest (OVH) in patients undergoing femoral to below the knee arterial bypass surgery. METHODS: The charts of 144 consecutive patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery over the course of 27 months were reviewed. A femoral to below the knee arterial bypass with saphenous vein was done in 88 patients (29 had EVH, 59 had OVH). The preoperative characteristics evaluated were age, gender, renal function, history of diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and previous infrainguinal bypass surgery on the affected side. End points included wound complications, length of hospital stay, operative time, angiographic and operative interventions for graft occlusion, patency rates, limb salvage, acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, and death. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and demographics were similar in the EVH and OVH groups. No operative intervention for occlusion was required in the EVH group (0/29) compared with 13.4% in the OVH group (8/59) (P = .03). At the mean follow-up time of 21 months, primary patency rate was 92.8% in the EVH group and 80.6% in the OVH group (P = .12). No significant differences were found between the EVH and OVH groups in postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, operative time, patency rates, limb salvage, and death. CONCLUSION: Despite our initial concerns of damaging the venous conduit with a minimally invasive approach to saphenous vein harvest, EVH in our experience has resulted in a trend toward improved patency rates and decreased infectious wound complications while affording the benefit of improved cosmesis. An endoscopic approach results in smaller incisions, decreased interventions for occlusion, and improved outcomes compared with OVH. EVH is the procedure of choice for harvesting saphenous vein for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass surgery.
机译:背景:尽管接受内窥镜静脉收获术(EVH)在冠状动脉搭桥术中的应用已被接受,但很少有研究证明EVH在周围血管疾病手术中的实施。我们假设在接受股骨至膝以下动脉搭桥手术的患者中,EVH与开放静脉收集(OVH)相比可改善结局。方法:回顾了27个月中连续144例接受宫腔旁路手术的患者的图表。 88例患者进行了大隐静脉股骨至膝下动脉搭桥术(29例为EVH,59例为OVH)。评估的术前特征是年龄,性别,肾功能,糖尿病史,高血压,吸烟和患侧以前进行过的下尿道旁路手术。终点包括伤口并发症,住院时间,手术时间,血管造影和手术干预(移植物阻塞),通畅率,肢体抢救,急性肾衰竭,心肌梗塞和死亡。结果:EVH和OVH组的患者特征和人口统计学相似。 EVH组(0/29)不需要进行手术干预,而OVH组(8/59)则不需要手术干预(P = .03)。在平均随访时间为21个月时,EVH组的初次通畅率为92.8%,OVH组的初次通畅率为80.6%(P = .12)。 EVH和OVH组之间在术后并发症,住院时间,手术时间,通畅率,肢体抢救和死亡方面没有显着差异。结论:尽管我们最初担心的是通过微创方法来收集大隐静脉而破坏静脉导管,但根据我们的经验,EVH导致通畅率提高和感染伤口并发症减少的趋势,同时带来了美容效果的改善。与OVH相比,内窥镜检查方法可减少切口,减少闭塞干预并改善结局。 EVH是收集大隐静脉用于股骨至膝盖以下动脉搭桥手术的首选程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号