首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Durability of the balloon-expandable covered versus bare-metal stents in the Covered versus Balloon Expandable Stent Trial (COBEST) for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease
【24h】

Durability of the balloon-expandable covered versus bare-metal stents in the Covered versus Balloon Expandable Stent Trial (COBEST) for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease

机译:球囊扩张式支架与球囊扩张式支架试验(COBEST)中的球囊扩张式有盖支架与裸机支架的耐用性用于治疗主动脉闭塞性疾病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: The Covered vs Balloon Expandable Stent Trial (COBEST) is the first multicenter trial to investigate the patency of covered stents (CSs) and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in the treatment of aortoiliac arterial disease. The short-term results demonstrated that CSs were superior to BMSs in maintaining patency for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions at 18 months and were equivalent to BMSs for TASC B lesions. The current study was conducted to determine if the initial patency advantage of CSs over BMSs was sustained at the 5-year follow-up.
机译:目的:有盖vs球囊扩张性支架试验(COBEST)是第一个多中心试验,研究了有盖支架(CSs)和裸金属支架(BMS)在治疗主动脉动脉疾病中的通畅性。短期结果表明,在18个月的跨大西洋跨社会共识(TASC)C和D病变保持通畅性方面,CS优于BMS,并且与TASC B病变的BMS相当。进行本研究是为了确定在5年的随访中,CS相对于BMS的初始通畅性优势是否得以维持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号