首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Clinical evaluation of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with 2-day-soluble gelatin sponge particles for hepatocellular carcinoma - Comparison with insoluble gelatin sponge particles
【24h】

Clinical evaluation of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with 2-day-soluble gelatin sponge particles for hepatocellular carcinoma - Comparison with insoluble gelatin sponge particles

机译:2天可溶明胶海绵颗粒经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的临床评估-与不溶性明胶海绵颗粒的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare therapeutic effect, adverse events, and embolized hepatic artery impairment in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization between Lipiodol plus insoluble gelatin sponge particles (Gelpart) and Lipiodol plus 2-day-soluble gelatin sponge particles (2DS-GSPs). Materials and Methods: In a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were assigned to the 2DS-GSP group or the Gelpart group. Radiographic response at 3 months per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors was evaluated as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were safety (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) within 3 months and hepatic branch artery impairment at the time of repeat chemoembolization (grade 0, no damage; grade I, mild vessel wall irregularity; grade II, overt stenosis; grade III, occlusion of more peripheral branch artery than subsegmental artery; grade IV, occlusion of subsegmental artery). Grade II, III, or IV indicated significant hepatic artery impairment. Results: Thirty-seven patients with 143 nodules were randomized to the 2DS-GSP group and 36 patients with 137 nodules were randomized to the Gelpart group. No significant differences in patient background existed between groups. Target lesion response and overall tumor response in the 2DS-GSP and Gelpart groups were 77.7% versus 76.9% and 78.3% versus 77.8%, respectively, with no significant differences. No significant difference in adverse events existed between groups. Hepatic artery impairment was observed in 5% of patients in the 2DS-GSP group (n = 32) and in 16% in the Gelpart group (n = 33; P<.001). Conclusions: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with 2DS-GSPs resulted in the same therapeutic and adverse effects as chemoembolization with Gelpart while causing significantly less hepatic artery impairment.
机译:目的:比较Lipiodol加不溶性明胶海绵颗粒(Gelpart)和Lipiodol加2天可溶明胶海绵颗粒(2DS-GSPs)之间经导管动脉化学栓塞的治疗效果,不良事件和肝动脉栓塞。材料和方法:在一项单中心,前瞻性,随机对照试验中,将肝细胞癌患者分为2DS-GSP组或Gelpart组。根据修改后的《实体肿瘤反应评估标准》,在3个月时的放射照相反应被评估为主要终点;次要终点是3个月内的安全性(根据不良事件通用术语标准,版本4.0)以及重复进行化学栓塞时的肝分支动脉损伤(0级,无损伤; I级,轻度血管壁不规则; II级,明显狭窄; III级,闭塞比周围节段动脉更多的外周分支动脉; IV级,闭塞下节段动脉。 II,III或IV级表明肝动脉明显受损。结果:37例143个结节患者被随机分配到2DS-GSP组,36例137个结节患者被随机分配到Gelpart组。两组之间患者背景无显着差异。 2DS-GSP组和Gelpart组的靶病变反应和总体肿瘤反应分别为77.7%,76.9%和78.3%和77.8%,无显着差异。两组之间的不良事件没有显着差异。在2DS-GSP组中,有5%的患者出现肝动脉损伤(n = 32),在Gelpart组中有16%的患者(n = 33; P <.001)。结论:2DS-GSP经导管动脉化疗栓塞与Gelpart化疗栓塞产生相同的治疗和不良反应,同时显着减少肝动脉损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号